06-13-2016, 12:57 PM | #15 |
Drives: 15 SilveradoLTZ,162SSVert BlazerRS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Minot,Maine
Posts: 644
|
NPP & MRC are BOTH very good. I feel that the MRC IS worth EVERY CENT!!!! Drive both back to back and You will become a Believer!!!!!
|
06-13-2016, 01:18 PM | #16 |
SABIO
Drives: 2016 CAMARO 1SS Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bradford, ON
Posts: 5,012
|
I passed on the MRC. Never think twice about it.
NPP is nice.....if you get a good one. Lots of exhuast options now. Springs are coming out and soon there will ne coil overs.
__________________
|
06-13-2016, 01:19 PM | #17 |
Drives: 1SS, A8, MRC, NPP, Blade Spoiler Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,485
|
I test drove a non-MRC SS and bought the MRC for my SS. The non-MRC SS had a hasher ride than my 2010 1LT camaro that had 19" wheels and all season tires. My new 1SS with MRC has a softer more comfortable ride than my 2010 1LT, but it also performs a bazillion times better as well.
I also think there is an apsect to MRC that some folks are not undertanding/appreciating. Suppose you modified your suspension to be very performance capable. That usually means a stiff harsh ride, but you can corner without any body pitch, yaw, or roll. But if you have ever driven a car like this with high speed through a turn and hit a bump, you it will normally upset the car quite a bit. The body throws a fit, and the car jumps around the road, because the suspension can't handle bumps. On the MRC equipped Camaro, you can throw this thing into a turn at high speed, and as suspected, there is no body roll, pitch, or yaw, but when you hit a bump, it just eats it up like it was nothing. It totally doesn't upset the car one bit, because the MRC comptuer can tell the difference between suspension input caused by driver input or road input and adjust automatically 1000 times per second, on each wheel individually. No, it's not going to feel like you are drving a greyhound bus when in tour mode, but it's not supposed to. It is a softer more comfortable ride than the 5th Gen LT, and much softer than the non-MRC 6th gen. But more importantly, when you are performance driving, and the road is not perfect, who cares?? The car will perform in a way that no non-MRC can replicate. Even on a road course, you are supposed to hit the curbs. The MRC equipped cars eat those curbs for breakfast and still stay more planted than the non-MRC cars. |
06-13-2016, 02:21 PM | #18 |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS, for go, not show. Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Pearland, Texas, United States
Posts: 426
|
I really thought about getting MRC but I drove both MRC and non-MRC SS's and felt they were close enough that I wouldn't miss MRC as much as I thought I would...ESPECIALLY when it comes time to replace to them at all 4 corners. I might be wrong but from what I've read they are very expense to replace. But that's just my 2 cents.
__________________
Camaro/Firebird fan since 1977! Previous rides: 1965 Pontiac GTO, 1977 Trans Am Special Ed. "Bandit", 1996 Camaro 3.8, 2002 Camaro Z28, 2014 Camaro 2SS/RS M6 Spring Special Edition Current ride: "SOUTHERNCROSS" - 2017 Camaro 1SS Silver Ice Metallic/Jet Black w/BO4 56V RZ9 NPP SFE SH1 VW9 W2D "And no BS! It's (the 1SS) everything you need and nothing you don't." -Craig Cole on the 1SS vs 2SS "Reach above your dreams of pleasure, giving life to those who died. Look beyond your own horizons, sail the ship of signs." -RJD 'The Sign of the Southern Cross' |
06-13-2016, 02:28 PM | #19 |
Drives: 2016 SS M6, NPP Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Hawthorne, CA
Posts: 1,957
|
I'm going to be lowering the car anyways so MRC not that critical since the ride will be a bit harsher with all aftermarket springs.
NPP, bright silver spoke rims is all I need since I'm probably not going to change the rims. It looks elegant, nice and sophisticated |
06-13-2016, 02:36 PM | #20 | |
Drives: 1SS, A8, MRC, NPP, Blade Spoiler Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,485
|
Quote:
http://www.newgmparts.com/auto-parts...uspension-scat |
|
06-13-2016, 03:03 PM | #21 | |
Sure, why not?
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, Jeep JKU Rubicon Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: SE Mass
Posts: 1,538
|
Quote:
__________________
This is that witty and clever statement that makes you chuckle.
|
|
06-13-2016, 03:17 PM | #22 |
Drives: 2013 RY SS Conv. Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: south jersey
Posts: 228
|
Dual-mode!
|
06-13-2016, 03:23 PM | #23 | |
Drives: Red Hot SS 1LE Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Boca Raton
Posts: 377
|
Quote:
|
|
06-13-2016, 03:35 PM | #24 |
Drives: 1SS, A8, MRC, NPP, Blade Spoiler Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,485
|
It's not louder than sport, the bypass valves (that bypass the muffler, and make the sound louder) are open all the time in track mode. Under Tour or Sport, the computer opens the valves when you punch it, and closes the valves under normal driving. The difference between Tour and Sport is that the comptuer is more agressive with opening the valves in Sport than Tour. Under Snow/Ice mode, the valves are always closed (also called stealth mode).
So as you can see, there are only two volume levels. It's quiet (relatively) when the valves are closed, and loud (reletively) when the valves are open. The modes adjust when/how the valves open and close. |
06-13-2016, 03:42 PM | #25 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS, for go, not show. Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Pearland, Texas, United States
Posts: 426
|
Quote:
__________________
Camaro/Firebird fan since 1977! Previous rides: 1965 Pontiac GTO, 1977 Trans Am Special Ed. "Bandit", 1996 Camaro 3.8, 2002 Camaro Z28, 2014 Camaro 2SS/RS M6 Spring Special Edition Current ride: "SOUTHERNCROSS" - 2017 Camaro 1SS Silver Ice Metallic/Jet Black w/BO4 56V RZ9 NPP SFE SH1 VW9 W2D "And no BS! It's (the 1SS) everything you need and nothing you don't." -Craig Cole on the 1SS vs 2SS "Reach above your dreams of pleasure, giving life to those who died. Look beyond your own horizons, sail the ship of signs." -RJD 'The Sign of the Southern Cross' |
|
06-13-2016, 03:51 PM | #26 | |
Drives: 1SS, A8, MRC, NPP, Blade Spoiler Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,485
|
Quote:
Here is the link for the rear: http://www.gmpartsoutlet.net/auto-pa...uspension-scat BUT, the regular struts are much cheaper at around $95 a piece for about $375 or so for the set of four. It is significantly cheaper, but the MRC is not outrageous anymore. At least when you are buying them for a chevy. Chevy also sells a lowering kit for MRC equipped cars as well. |
|
06-13-2016, 04:40 PM | #27 |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS, for go, not show. Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Pearland, Texas, United States
Posts: 426
|
Yeah, at this point I think I'd rather have it betting on the costs coming down exponentially by the time they need replacing. This was the one option that I've been bouncing between yes or no. I'd rather pay for it now rather than wished I'd had it later.
__________________
Camaro/Firebird fan since 1977! Previous rides: 1965 Pontiac GTO, 1977 Trans Am Special Ed. "Bandit", 1996 Camaro 3.8, 2002 Camaro Z28, 2014 Camaro 2SS/RS M6 Spring Special Edition Current ride: "SOUTHERNCROSS" - 2017 Camaro 1SS Silver Ice Metallic/Jet Black w/BO4 56V RZ9 NPP SFE SH1 VW9 W2D "And no BS! It's (the 1SS) everything you need and nothing you don't." -Craig Cole on the 1SS vs 2SS "Reach above your dreams of pleasure, giving life to those who died. Look beyond your own horizons, sail the ship of signs." -RJD 'The Sign of the Southern Cross' |
06-13-2016, 05:38 PM | #28 |
Drives: 16' 2SS M6 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 573
|
NPP, Heads Up Display, Leather/Memory Seats and surprisingly for me, the blind spot monitoring really helps a lot! I'm very happy with the stock suspension, and long term will be cheaper to maintain and look forward to lowering!
Somewhatdamaged |
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|