Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-17-2015, 03:41 PM   #169
Wizard1183

 
Wizard1183's Avatar
 
Drives: ABM SS2/RS M6
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Lafayette,LA
Posts: 2,232
Send a message via Yahoo to Wizard1183
I find so interesting how in 2013, he says this:

“We’re not following Ford”, Oppenheiser told AG during the 2013 SEMA show. “As long as they’ll pay me to be the chief engineer, I’m going to fight for every horsepower I can and every cylinder I can,” he said.

Read more: http://gmauthority.com/blog/2013/11/...#ixzz3gBQZlOVq

And now? He says a 4 cyl. BELONGS in a Camaro.
__________________


Life is short, drive it like you stole it!
Wizard1183 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 03:47 PM   #170
FenwickHockey65
General Motors Aficionado
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2020 Colorado
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 37,371
Send a message via AIM to FenwickHockey65
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wizard1183 View Post
I find so interesting how in 2013, he says this:

“We’re not following Ford”, Oppenheiser told AG during the 2013 SEMA show. “As long as they’ll pay me to be the chief engineer, I’m going to fight for every horsepower I can and every cylinder I can,” he said.

Read more: http://gmauthority.com/blog/2013/11/...#ixzz3gBQZlOVq

And now? He says a 4 cyl. BELONGS in a Camaro.
Read the quote you posted again. He never said there wouldn't be a 4-cylinder.

People twisted what he said into drawing their own conclusions.

And what he said is true, GM didn't follow Ford. The 2.0T is the base engine, the V6 wasn't neutered to make room for a premium 4-cylinder.
__________________
2023 GMC Canyon Elevation
2020 Chevrolet Colorado W/T Extended Cab (State-issued)
FenwickHockey65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 04:12 PM   #171
SuperSound


 
SuperSound's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 5,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
Read the quote you posted again. He never said there wouldn't be a 4-cylinder.

People twisted what he said into drawing their own conclusions.

And what he said is true, GM didn't follow Ford. The 2.0T is the base engine, the V6 wasn't neutered to make room for a premium 4-cylinder.
x2
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3

"Voices in your head are not considered insider information."

3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!)
6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!)
SuperSound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 04:37 PM   #172
Wizard1183

 
Wizard1183's Avatar
 
Drives: ABM SS2/RS M6
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Lafayette,LA
Posts: 2,232
Send a message via Yahoo to Wizard1183
His stroke wasn't good for the fight....
__________________


Life is short, drive it like you stole it!
Wizard1183 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 04:39 PM   #173
Mr Twisty


 
Mr Twisty's Avatar
 
Drives: the 2nd amendment home
Join Date: May 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 14,707
A few years ago I thought t4 would be a bad idea, now, I'm convinced otherwise.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
Mr Twisty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 05:09 PM   #174
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
They can put whatever they want in the damn thing. If it helps it get more sales and stay on the market I'm all for it. Now the day they don't offer a v8 is when we will have something to cry about.
ULTRAZLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 06:00 PM   #175
ssrs2lt


 
ssrs2lt's Avatar
 
Drives: too many
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: oh va pa ma tx
Posts: 3,046
Yes all the options need to sell and sell as a quality build. The Canadian plant set a very high bar..
__________________
ssrs2lt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 06:24 PM   #176
Bhobbs


 
Bhobbs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 View Post
Car #2 is a 2015 1LE, looks like #1/3 are 2016 1SS models.

I'm guessing #5/7/8 are Corvette Stingrays, #6 is a 5th gen SS automatic, and #9 is a Z06. #10 is one of the HD trucks.
Number 3 and number 5 have nearly identical VINs and number 3 is clearly a 6th gen SS. Why would the Corvette Stingray and Camaro SS have nearly identical VINs?
__________________
Bhobbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 10:30 PM   #177
doc7000

 
Drives: 2004 Pontiac Grand Prix
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Lomita,CA
Posts: 806
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Twisty View Post
A few years ago I thought t4 would be a bad idea, now, I'm convinced otherwise.
I fall into the same boat, just a few years ago I too thought that a turbo 4 in a Camaro would be a bad idea.

However I do think that what Ford has done was a mistake to make the V-6 the standard engine and the turbo I-4 the prem. Though Ford seems to be trying to push their ecoboost branding along their entire product lines. I feel that the ecoboost should have been the base engine and Ford should have maybe upgraded their 3.7L V-6 as the optional engine. The fact that the 2.3 ecoboost will be priced similar to the 3.6L V-6 Camaro with 335BHP in which you will get 335BHP on regular in the Camaro and only 275BHP on regular in the Mustang. When the full specs for the Camaro is released we will be able to get a more complete picture.

I guess this could go two ways, one with auto makers trending to turbocharged engines people might look at the ecoboost and say it is more modern because it is a turbocharged engine. The other way is people might prefer the audio track of the V-6 Camaro over the ecoboost engine along with more power. Not to mention that some people like to rev their engines out and for that they will probably enjoy the 3.6L Camaro over the ecoboost. However for those who love to have lots of mid range torque the ecoboost will be superior. The 8 speed auto 3.6L is probably going to out perform the ecoboost even if the Camaro is a bit heavier then the Mustang (lowest level ecoboost vs fully loaded 2LT V-6 Camaro). It really is going to be interesting to see how things turn out, BTW there is nothing special about all of these turbo engines going into cars. Remember the 80s and early 90s when you had tons of turbocharged cars offered by many different automakers.
doc7000 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.