Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-01-2016, 02:13 PM   #71
bharabs
 
bharabs's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 1SS 1LE Summit White
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Price is a crucial factor for sure. You get a lot for what you pay, but then I would prefer to start at a lower base price and then add whatever I want as per my affordability.

Also, another factor is how much better are the 4 and 6 cylinder models compared to competitors? The volume is mostly in these models and I don't think these customers care much about performance. They would most certainly buy based on price.

To give you my perspective when I bought my Mustang V6, I actually was in a dilemma of whether I should buy a V6 accord or a Mustang and made the decision based on pricing as Mustang was almost comparable to Accord. I am planning to sell my Mustang and one of the buyers, who came to see my car was in the same dilemma too. And be rest assured, that crowd is most likely not even here to express their opinion.
bharabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2016, 02:22 PM   #72
z28guy30
 
z28guy30's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 camaro 1ss
Join Date: May 2011
Location: hawaii
Posts: 326
This reminds me of the 90's when the Camaro outperformed the Mustang in every metric but was outsold 3 to 1. As long as the Camaro sticks around I am fine by it.
__________________
2016 Camaro SS, Summit White, A8, MRC, Rally Stripes, Black Bowties.
z28guy30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2016, 02:24 PM   #73
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,172
Quote:
Originally Posted by bharabs View Post
Price is a crucial factor for sure. You get a lot for what you pay, but then I would prefer to start at a lower base price and then add whatever I want as per my affordability.

Also, another factor is how much better are the 4 and 6 cylinder models compared to competitors? The volume is mostly in these models and I don't think these customers care much about performance. They would most certainly buy based on price.

To give you my perspective when I bought my Mustang V6, I actually was in a dilemma of whether I should buy a V6 accord or a Mustang and made the decision based on pricing as Mustang was almost comparable to Accord. I am planning to sell my Mustang and one of the buyers, who came to see my car was in the same dilemma too. And be rest assured, that crowd is most likely not even here to express their opinion.
I've tried to make that point but many don't understand that when it comes to a stylish V6 or even 4 cylinder coupe a FWD Accord (among other cars) is now in the consideration set. The Genesis is another car that falls into consideration if you remove the V8 from your list of wants.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2016, 02:28 PM   #74
MEDISIN

 
MEDISIN's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 CTS-V Sedan
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 1,505
For perspective...

Fleet (i.e. Rental) Sales (%) YTD:
Mustang 31%
Challenger 24%
Camaro 8% (may be left over 2015's - I haven't seen a single 2016 for rent)

Average Transaction Price (ATP) after rebates and incentives
Mustang $34k
Challenger $36k
Camaro $38k

I don't have a breakdown by trim but GT350 and Hellcat's are included in those numbers whereas the 2SS is the most expensive Camaro currently available.

So yes Camaro is selling lower volume but a high percentage are retail sales and at a higher average price point than the competition.
__________________
2012 - Present: 2011 CTS-V Sedan, A6, Airaid, Zmax TB and Tune by R.P.M. = 535 hp/503 lb-ft.
2009 - 2012: 2010 2SS RS IBM M6, MGW Shifter, BMR Trailing Arms/Tunnel Brace, Roto-Fab CAI, VMAX Ported TB, Kooks 6511-Complete (Headers, X-Pipe, Mufflers), dyno tuned by R.P.M. = 415 hp/412 lb-ft.

"Not giving a f*^k is truly the greatest luxury, and no luxury car gives fewer f*^k's than a CTS-V." - Matt Hardigree
MEDISIN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2016, 02:31 PM   #75
RagingHawk
 
Drives: Fuel efficient compact sedan :)
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 707
Pricing on the 4/6 cylinder models is too high. Most V6 models I see are in 33-37K range. Also the entry model being a turbo engine may have something to do with it.

The SS is priced fairly, and is an overall amazing car. Practicality is not important in a sports coupe car. Visibility isn't an issue either, for most people that opt for V8 trim. The design is very nice, especially with optioned out wheels. People need to see the car in person, I seen a hyper blue and bright yellow pair of SS models recently and fell in love. The car is very aggressive looking, but also separates itself from the competition. It has a more 'prestigious' look or appeal. It strikes you as a car being at a higher level than just American muscle, almost between American muscle and BMW M4 prestigious appeal.

The recent Challenger refresh also looks well, like the Mustang, their designs appeal to the average consumer base. I've noticed most that opt for a Mustang don't care for performance, it is the looks and interior style that won them over, along with with the affordability. Challengers on other hand, most people I know with Challengers have the performance SRT, Scat pack and R/T models. Camaro wise, I've seen mostly SS models.

So the Challenger and Camaro win over more performance oriented enthusiasts. Obviously the Challenger is tailored more to brute power and straight line performance, with classic muscle vibe. While the Camaro is for all around performance.

I like all three, but the Camaro is my most preferred. I like the direction GM took with the performance model.

Also ...there are no Mustang GT premium's being advertised for high 20's. I don't know where some people live, but in my area they are all selling for high 30's, mostly 39K-40K. And I'm not paying that money when I can get employee pricing with GM and a much better value in the Camaro.
RagingHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2016, 02:33 PM   #76
z28guy30
 
z28guy30's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 camaro 1ss
Join Date: May 2011
Location: hawaii
Posts: 326
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEDISIN View Post
For perspective...

Fleet (i.e. Rental) Sales (%) YTD:
Mustang 31%
Challenger 24%
Camaro 8% (may be left over 2015's - I haven't seen a single 2016 for rent)

Average Transaction Price (ATP) after rebates and incentives
Mustang $34k
Challenger $36k
Camaro $38k

I don't have a breakdown by trim but GT350 and Hellcat's are included in those numbers whereas the 2SS is the most expensive Camaro currently available.

So yes Camaro is selling lower volume but a high percentage are retail sales and at a higher average price point than the competition.
Rental cars or not the Mustang is outselling the Challenger and Camaro both to the public also; however, I live on Oahu and will admit there are hundreds of S550 rental cars on the road. Mainly V6 models.

IMO The Camaro looks better and outperforms it's competition, but the 6th gen was not a drastic change in styling and I am sure there are people that are also turned off by the worthless back seat. I love my Camaro and will be holding on to it for a long time, but my teenage son is 6ft tall and his knees hit the back of the front seat and he has to duck his head while riding in the back.
__________________
2016 Camaro SS, Summit White, A8, MRC, Rally Stripes, Black Bowties.
z28guy30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2016, 02:36 PM   #77
Commando16SS
 
Drives: n/a
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: NJ
Posts: 117
GM just announced incentives for July - 20% off MSRP for most vehicles...except Camaro.

Are these cars hitting their expectations to the point where they don't want to offer incentives?
Commando16SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2016, 02:36 PM   #78
ChevyRules

 
Drives: 2021 Tesla Model 3 LR
Join Date: May 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
As one of the minority views here on visibility, it was noticeably better in the 5th Gen. But it's not just that one attribute. It's a smaller trunk, a smaller back seat. GM went to a smaller architecture to reap the HUGE performance gains, and they were BIG. But there were trade offs going to Alpha from Zeta. And if you want a size comparison, I could shoot a picture from my garage with our ATS and SS sitting side by side. Big difference in size.
No need for a picture. My dad has an ATS as well. I know all too well GM struggles with packaging for a given size of vehicle.

I've driven the 5th and 6th gen Camaro's( very quickly mind you). I loved the pre-refresh 5th gens looks and probably could live with the interior. But when I drove it at GM's Main street driving event( I believe that is what it was called), it left me unimpressed. Now it was an automatic SS so it only had the L99 that made 400 HP instead of the LS3. It felt heavy, quite a bit of body roll, etc. It could have been because I drove the Corvette right before it, but it didn't excite me. I understand the 1LE did fix a lot of the issues the regular SS had, but I never got the chance to drive one.

Now the 6th gen, it excites me. Which isn't a big surprise given the fact I love driving my dads ATS. I had a blast when I went to the dealer last month and test drove one with NPP, the 8 speed auto, and MRC. I don't use the rear seats much in my Aura( it is 9.5 years old and the rear seats look as they did when I bought it in 2006) so I don't mind that trade off. The visibility only has me concerned when backing up the vehicle. The one thing that does suck is the small trunk. While I wish I could get leather seats and nav with the 1SS, I don't mind paying for the 2SS either. Hopefully come next year, I will have been able to save enough money to pick up a 2017/2018 Camaro 2SS. Haven't driven a Mustang GT yet( plan to just to have a fair comparison), but my impressions of it seems to be the Mustang is more of a cruiser than performance oriented. The GT350 might tempt me, but it is out of my price range.
ChevyRules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2016, 02:40 PM   #79
aestil
 
Drives: White
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 251
Quote:
Originally Posted by z28guy30 View Post
Rental cars or not the Mustang is outselling the Challenger and Camaro both to the public also; however, I live on Oahu and will admit there are hundreds of S550 rental cars on the road. Mainly V6 models.

IMO The Camaro looks better and outperforms it's competition, but the 6th gen was not a drastic change in styling and I am sure there are people that are also turned off by the worthless back seat. I love my Camaro and will be holding on to it for a long time, but my teenage son is 6ft tall and his knees hit the back of the front seat and he has to duck his head while riding in the back.
The Mustang back seat is equally worthless.
aestil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2016, 02:46 PM   #80
raptor5244


 
Drives: 2022 CT4-V Blackwing
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commando16SS View Post
GM just announced incentives for July - 20% off MSRP for most vehicles...except Camaro.

Are these cars hitting their expectations to the point where they don't want to offer incentives?
Maybe. I think it would definitely send the wrong message to the market if they started discounting a brand new model 20%. Having to discount a car 20% means it is a failure, they need to move inventory to make room for new models or is it just priced wrong for the market.
__________________
2002 Corvette Z06 - Black - Sold
2013 Camaro SS 1LE - Black - M6 - Sold
2016 Camaro SS - Mosaic Black - A8 - Sold
2017 C7 Stingray - M7 Coupe - Sold
2019 C7 Grand Sport M7 Vert - Sold
2021 Camaro ZL1 - Black - A10 - Sold
2019 Tesla Model 3
2022 CT4-V Blackwing - M6
raptor5244 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2016, 02:47 PM   #81
ChefBorOzzy

 
ChefBorOzzy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 F150
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,196
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEDISIN View Post
For perspective...

Fleet (i.e. Rental) Sales (%) YTD:
Mustang 31%
Challenger 24%
Camaro 8% (may be left over 2015's - I haven't seen a single 2016 for rent)

Average Transaction Price (ATP) after rebates and incentives
Mustang $34k
Challenger $36k
Camaro $38k

I don't have a breakdown by trim but GT350 and Hellcat's are included in those numbers whereas the 2SS is the most expensive Camaro currently available.

So yes Camaro is selling lower volume but a high percentage are retail sales and at a higher average price point than the competition.
Where do you get those numbers? I've looked before but couldn't find anything.
ChefBorOzzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2016, 02:47 PM   #82
Raven87
C'mon- really?
 
Raven87's Avatar
 
Drives: Looking for a ZL1
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Nortwestern Ohio
Posts: 1,966
This is deja vu...

__________________
Steve
2018 Camaro 2SS 1LE Black #3805 - SOLD
Raven87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2016, 02:47 PM   #83
Marty McFlew
Banned
 
Drives: 17 SuperSport Camaro 6 on the Flo'
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 1,507
Sales dropping like a brick. Challenger outsells Camaro. Overpriced!
Marty McFlew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2016, 02:50 PM   #84
Marty McFlew
Banned
 
Drives: 17 SuperSport Camaro 6 on the Flo'
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 1,507
Look at that tall red bar! Mustang is KING of Sales. Why!? Somebody tell me WHY!!!
Marty McFlew is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.