Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-16-2012, 06:19 PM   #1
Oneflyenyceguy
Hmm...Something Clever
 
Oneflyenyceguy's Avatar
 
Drives: Blac on Blaq on Blak 2012 Camaro LS
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 413
Question E85

So i know this has been asked over and over again and prolly answered in full by now but whats the answer to the E-85 question? random check of this website says it is how do i know for sure? I have read that e-85 vehicles have a differen gas cap but apparently not all of them.
http://e85vehicles.com/
__________________

Adjustments: 20% tint all around, Emblem Pros Dash plaque, Rockford Fosgate P-300/12
Oneflyenyceguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 06:24 PM   #2
tazz3
 
Drives: 2012 camaro
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: east islip ny
Posts: 228
the story says that the camaro is on its wish list. so so far the camaro cant run on E85.

here is the story


The 2010 Camaro is at the top of our wish list to be GM's next E85 Flex Fuel vehicle. High performance vehicles should automatically be ready for a high performance fuel like E85 ethanol. The Camaro comes in standard 3.6L 220 HP v6 as well as the high performance 6.2l 378 horsepower v8 which would be 385 HP or so simply by running on E85..
tazz3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 06:49 PM   #3
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by tazz3 View Post
the story says that the camaro is on its wish list. so so far the camaro cant run on E85.

here is the story


The 2010 Camaro is at the top of our wish list to be GM's next E85 Flex Fuel vehicle. High performance vehicles should automatically be ready for a high performance fuel like E85 ethanol. The Camaro comes in standard 3.6L 220 HP v6 as well as the high performance 6.2l 378 horsepower v8 which would be 385 HP or so simply by running on E85..
220HP V6?? 378HP V8?? Where did you get this from? An article from well before the 5th gen's release??

Bottom line, the LFX engine is E85 compatible in other applications like the Impala, but is not currently listed for use in the Camaro. Apparantly the tune and sensors for it are not in place.

That said, with an aftermarket tune for E85 the V6 has shown very nice power improvements...the only downside that has shown its head thus far is that in winter months it can be rough when starting the car until the engine heats up.

Long term effects have not been tested in the Camaro V6.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 07:20 PM   #4
Deki

 
Deki's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Mustang GT
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,764
I don't know about the Camaro, but my best friend just got an E85 tune on his 5.0 and he's making 15whp more on it than 91. Also, his gas mileage has decreased by about 20%
__________________
2018 Mustang GT
Deki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 08:30 PM   #5
Oneflyenyceguy
Hmm...Something Clever
 
Oneflyenyceguy's Avatar
 
Drives: Blac on Blaq on Blak 2012 Camaro LS
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 413
geez, so e-85 sucks if your not getting into hardcore racing...
__________________

Adjustments: 20% tint all around, Emblem Pros Dash plaque, Rockford Fosgate P-300/12
Oneflyenyceguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-16-2012, 11:32 PM   #6
tazz3
 
Drives: 2012 camaro
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: east islip ny
Posts: 228
I copyed the story from,the e85 site and YEAH THEY ARE WRONG about the horsepower of the V6
tazz3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 12:39 AM   #7
2011camaro2ss rs
 
Drives: 2011 2ss rs package
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mo
Posts: 98
I converted my evo 10 to e-85 and it was
Well worth it more crisp and Responsive and
Just so smooth. U will loose fuel mileage but
If it is not a daily driver you won't care u lost some
Fuel mileage. Lethal raceing is going to covert my
Ss I can't wate
2011camaro2ss rs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 06:48 AM   #8
bannonm

 
bannonm's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS M6 VR
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 1,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneflyenyceguy View Post
geez, so e-85 sucks if your not getting into hardcore racing...
Exactly, we just bought a flex fuel car for my wife to commute 180 miles a day. For kicks I filled it with E85 and the mileage went from 38 to 29. For less than 50 cents a gallon difference it wasn't worth it. Only if you're interested in saving the environment while depleting your pocket book should you use E85. If the cost made up for the decrease in mileage the I could handle using it.
__________________
bannonm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 06:57 AM   #9
fbodfather


 
fbodfather's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaros................
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Seven Fields, PA (Pittsburgh)
Posts: 4,523
Do not use E85 in a Camaro. The fuel system and associated components are not made to be compatible - -and you will do some serious damage.
__________________
fbodfather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 06:57 AM   #10
mattsfirstSS

 
mattsfirstSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 1SS/RS L99
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Wilmington. NC
Posts: 794
Quote:
Originally Posted by bannonm View Post
Exactly, we just bought a flex fuel car for my wife to commute 180 miles a day. For kicks I filled it with E85 and the mileage went from 38 to 29. For less than 50 cents a gallon difference it wasn't worth it. Only if you're interested in saving the environment while depleting your pocket book should you use E85. If the cost made up for the decrease in mileage the I could handle using it.
thank god someone said it. Decrease in efficiency not made up for by decrease in cost. More horsepower but much less gas mileage. FWIW I only use V 93 which doesn't contain any ethanol. Only one Shell in town, I make the drive to know Im getting what Im paying for and not up to 10% ethanol.
mattsfirstSS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.