[LesserO2Evils]

Originally Posted by amerhash28

They've already excepted the fact that the SS will cook the GT. they are trying to compare it to the GT350.

Shocker... The very same thing they did with the Terminator Cobras when the GT, the Bullet, and the Mach 1 failed against the LS1 cars... Build a higher spec'd/higher PRICED car, then claim a shallow victory.
Weaksauce.

[13vertss]

Originally Posted by Bhobbs

He's using the 122 mph trap misprint as proof of a ringer. Never mind the ATS-V just ran a 12.1 at 116. I guess the ringer was not available for the Head 2 Head.

Originally Posted by hotlapZL1

[blacks550gt]

Originally Posted by amerhash28

But lets not forget that there is a lot of good guys with great informations and not brand loyal but unfortunately finding this kind of members in that fanboy atmosphere is very hard

Just gotta check in places other than the vs section. There's a lot of people there that give the camaro it's well deserved props. Like many here, that prefer camaro over mustang, I prefer mustang over camaro. Beauty will always be in the eyes of the beholder. These cars have come so far, that how can people say one is better than the other. Just get the one that you like, and smile away.

[Noob]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noob
Our german Ford sheet says for the GT automatic 3732kg with 90% fuel and a 75kg driver.
Is that correct ?

Originally Posted by SuperSound

8000lbs? Maybe you saw 3732lbs which would be more likely for a base GT.

oh sry, sure it is 1732kg for the GT autom. and 1720kg for the manual.

[Punk_rider]

Originally Posted by amerhash28

They've already excepted the fact that the SS will cook the GT. they are trying to compare it to the GT350.

Actually the GT is 4 seconds slower than the 1LE ... that posted a time before repavement ...

You can expect a bigger gap then ...

The GT is a track failure.

But again, how many GT owners will track? That track-ready trend is really weird. So few people going to the track ...

It's however fun to see it being ugly AND slow

[SpeedIsLife]

Originally Posted by Punk_rider

Actually the GT is 4 seconds slower than the 1LE ... that posted a time before repavement ...

You can expect a bigger gap then ...

The GT is a track failure.

But again, how many GT owners will track? That track-ready trend is really weird. So few people going to the track ...

It's however fun to see it being ugly AND slow

You know very little. Stop now.

[ChefBorOzzy]

So much butthurt over there still. Claiming that it wasn't the PP. All they would have to do is read the article to find out the truth. According to them, GM sends ringers and Ford sends non track ready Mustang. "I don't understand why Ford would send a base Mustang to lightning lap. They don't care about magazine tests". Trololol.

I just can't believe the amount of lying, twisting of information, and excuse making that a certain group of people make.id never do that for a product I own. Enjoy it and be honest. Holy crap.

[ChefBorOzzy]

Someone may want to show them the PP wheels.

[SuperSound]

Originally Posted by ChefBorOzzy

Someone may want to show them the PP wheels.

And on both of them there

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

[ChefBorOzzy]

Originally Posted by thePill

Well, not bad for the Base car... I hope it wasn't a Loaded Premium. That would just be...


On the other hand, I do like seeing the worst case scenario reported. The loaded weights and performance. If Ford is in fact selling more loaded Premiums, don't you think that is what they should send?

I wasn't really interested in the Base GT's performance BUT, looking at the results now, I'm actually impressed. It's just as fast as the previous GT at VIR, maybe a little cheaper, looks a lot better and still has a $2000 Performance Pack to option.


Not bad for a volume car... the base is still probably beyond my current skill level.

I'd rather see a base GT350 run...

If it's not bad for a base car, then it's bad for a PP, right? Lolol. It's funny how this man can find any information he wants, but supposedly can't see that they were both optioned with PP in a published article.. Maybe he needs inside sources for that as well..

[ilirg]

Wow, that's masked defeat if I ever saw it. Can almost taste the tears through the words.

[90503]

...Pretty sad....Their only hope is that it wasn't a GTPP....(but it was)....look at the VIR results and classifications....the GT(PP) was in a higher ranked class, and on a newer, faster paved track was 4 seconds slower than an older, lower ranked class 1LE that ran on the older, slower track surface...

...This is gonna be a tough one for them to spin....I almost feel sorry for them. The excuses and bashing of Camaro will reach a new all-time low over there....

Hopefully their GT-R will come out faster than at least one model of Camaro....

[Punk_rider]

Originally Posted by SpeedIsLife

You know very little. Stop now.

Originally Posted by 90503

...Pretty sad....Their only hope is that it wasn't a GTPP....(but it was)....look at the VIR results and classifications....the GT(PP) was in a higher ranked class, and on a newer, faster paved track was 4 seconds slower than an older, lower ranked class 1LE that ran on the older, slower track surface...

...This is gonna be a tough one for them to spin....I almost feel sorry for them. The excuses and bashing of Camaro will reach a new all-time low over there....

Hopefully their GT-R will come out faster than at least one model of Camaro....

[LesserO2Evils]

Those guys are so sad. Id be ashamed of my very existence, knowing how visible my distorting of reality, and lack of ability to accept failure, are. Because that is EXACTLY what the 6th Gen Mustang is(PP, or otherwise) a performance failure. This is just more proof. Its no longer a matter of "opinion".