[TommyTheCat]

Originally Posted by Jeb114

This is a guess but I am getting the feeling Chevy is going down the Porsche 911, type of street and track car. not the dinosaur Brute type of car. more European, Light agile, high rpm type of car. This is interesting now.

But it's a muscle car.

I'm really not a fan of the wing at all

[TommyTheCat]

Originally Posted by AlexM

All good points, I think we should not exclude a hatchback, very possible.

There's no hatchback.

[DGthe3]

Originally Posted by TommyTheCat

But it's a muscle car.

I'm really not a fan of the wing at all

Chevelles were muscle cars. 442s were muscle cars. GTOs were muscle cars. Camaros were pony cars.

[HDRDTD]

Originally Posted by DGthe3

Chevelles were muscle cars. 442s were muscle cars. GTOs were muscle cars. Camaros were pony cars.

Let's NOT start that age old debate yet again please?
Back to topic?

[Angrybird 12]

Originally Posted by AlexM

All good points, I think we should not exclude a hatchback, very possible.

If it were going to be a hatchback the cutline for it would be like the Stingray on the outside of the rear window. People were already complaining about rear visibility with it being a hatchback that would even be worse. Plus a hatchback would increase weight instead of reducing it. It would need more structural reenforcement for that big hole in the back.

[KMPrenger]

Originally Posted by HDRDTD

Let's NOT start that age old debate yet again please?
Back to topic?

Agreed.

[AlexM]

Originally Posted by Angrybird 12

If it were going to be a hatchback the cutline for it would be like the Stingray on the outside of the rear window. People were already complaining about rear visibility with it being a hatchback that would even be worse. Plus a hatchback would increase weight instead of reducing it. It would need more structural reenforcement for that big hole in the back.

Looking at the pictures one more time, I believe you're right. If the cutline continues under the wing like shown below, we clearly have a trunk lid.

[DenverTaco07]

Originally Posted by AlexM

Looking at the pictures one more time, I believe you're right. If the cutline continues under the wing like shown below, we clearly have a trunk lid.

yes, this is correct, most of the body between the lights to the bumper gonna open up...I didn't think of that.

[Angrybird 12]

Originally Posted by AlexM

Looking at the pictures one more time, I believe you're right. If the cutline continues under the wing like shown below, we clearly have a trunk lid.

The 5thgen convertible has a shorter trunk lid than the coupe does and I have no problems getting stuff in the trunk.

[Camaro68396]

Originally Posted by HuJass

I'm starting to see an early 2nd gen influence in the roof line, door window shape, and under window character line.

The way that taillight cuts into the quarter panel, I could see as a throwback to '74-'81s, as well.

[Jeb114]

There appears to be no room for a convertible top? And if there is one it will not have any trunk room.

[HDRDTD]

Originally Posted by Jeb114

There appears to be no room for a convertible top? And if there is one it will not have any trunk room.

A, we have already seen convertibles in cammo.
B. the current convertible's top folds down and takes up about the top 1/2 of the trunk space leaving the bottom half of the trunk available for storage plus a portion of the trunk near the bumpaer at full trunk depth.

No reason the Gen6 convertible won't work the same way.

You don't buy a convertible if you need huge trunk space.

[mako22]

Originally Posted by JoeYock

Don't know how nobody has posted this, but this came in the E-mail today.

whoa thanks for posting this, I missed it. Cool to start seeing more detail hidden by camo....

[camaro5]

http://blog.caranddriver.com/look-mo...d-rear-fender/