View Poll Results: Are You For Black Boxes Standard In All New Model Cars? | |||
Yes | 15 | 19.48% | |
No | 62 | 80.52% | |
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll |
Post Reply
|
|
Thread Tools |
12-08-2012, 12:55 PM | #1 |
Banned
|
Feds Propose Making Black Boxes Standard In New Cars
raising privacy hackles for example in Chevys.
Federal auto safety officials today proposed a new rule requiring black boxes -- data recorders that capture the moments before and after a crash -- in all new U.S. cars and trucks. Such recorders already come standard in most new vehicles, but the auto industry opposes a mandate, and the rule will do little to solve a simmering legal battle over who can see what the black boxes know. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says it will require all new U.S. vehicles to have black boxes by Sept. 1, 2014, noting that 96 percent of 2013 models already come with them standard. The new proposal does not change the 15 types of data black boxes should record when it senses a crash. "By understanding how drivers respond in a crash and whether key safety systems operate properly, NHTSA and automakers can make our vehicles and our roadways even safer," said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. "This proposal will give us the critical insight and information we need to save more lives." In use since the 1970s, event data recorders were originally installed as part of air bag systems, recording data such as acceleration, speed, braking and bag deployment in the few seconds before and after a wreck. While the data include whether the driver is wearing a seat belt, it doesn't record any other facts about the driver or the car's location, and can only keep a maximum of five seconds of information. Safety advocates have long contended black boxes could be used to improve crashworthiness or show why accidents took place; such boxes did help Toyota convince federal regulators two years ago that most sudden acceleration complaints not tied to defects involved drivers mistaking the gas and brake pedals. But the boxes -- typically installed out of sight -- remain a mystery to most car owners and a privacy concern to many. States have set a panoply of laws governing who can access the data stored in a black box; some allow law enforcement agencies to do so at an accident scene without a warrant, while others require some court oversight, but 37 states have no rules. The boxes themselves can't be turned off or disabled, and most require special software to access and read. In the Toyota cases, many probes were hampered because the black box data could only be read by Toyota engineers. In a few high-profile crashes, black box data has been used to contradict the driver's explanation for a crash. When Massachusetts Lt. Gov. Timothy Murray wrecked his state-owned Ford Crown Victoria a year ago, he initially said he had been driving near the speed limit; the black box data revealed he was driving 100 mph without his seat belt on, likely because he fell asleep behind the wheel. Data from an SUV that crashed while carrying New Jersey Gov. Jon Corzine in 2007 showed it was doing 91 mph at the time of the wreck -- and that Corzine wasn't wearing a seat belt. Several courts have allowed black box data as evidence in cases involving car crashes, but experts warn that the boxes are far from foolproof. Electrical surges have been known to erase or scramble the 15 data points modern boxes are required to collect, and the sensors can report faulty information. While federal law generally says the data belongs to car's owner, many insurance contracts allow insurance companies to gather the data after the crash. While automakers have asked NHTSA to clarify privacy concerns in any new rule, it will likely fall to Congress to decide who gets to talk to the spy in your dashboard. |
12-08-2012, 12:56 PM | #2 |
Drives: 2006 Silverado SS, 2009 G8 GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 13,313
|
They have been in car's for a loooooooooooong time now.....
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=264673 And also here... http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=264694 |
12-08-2012, 12:59 PM | #3 |
Banned
|
Yes i think we all know they have. But, it's not "Standard" in all new vehicles yet. Give it another few years it will be lol.
|
12-08-2012, 01:01 PM | #4 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS 6MT Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Westchester, New York
Posts: 3,715
|
Go ahead, my car, my property, I'll just take it out.
|
12-08-2012, 01:01 PM | #5 | |
Drives: 2006 Silverado SS, 2009 G8 GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 13,313
|
Quote:
It really doesn't matter.... As long as you are not driving like a idiot when you get into a accident nothing changes. Last edited by ShnOmac; 12-08-2012 at 01:12 PM. |
|
12-08-2012, 01:03 PM | #6 |
Super Bee
Drives: 2010 Camaro ABM and Sunrise Gold Join Date: May 2009
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 862
|
Good, will help place fault where it should be.
__________________
SuperMaro
|
12-08-2012, 01:04 PM | #7 |
|
__________________
The DREAM is free... It's the HUSTLE that is sold seperately
|
12-08-2012, 01:08 PM | #8 |
Drives: 2006 Silverado SS, 2009 G8 GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 13,313
|
I don't think you actually can....
"Gary Biller, executive director of the National Motorists Association: “It’s in the cars, it can’t be turned off, and the information is available to anyone with a court order. Our members ask whether these devices can be disabled, but they can’t, because they are integral to the computer systems that control modern cars.” |
12-08-2012, 01:14 PM | #9 |
ROAD COURSE JUNKIE
|
We don't need big brother in our lives anymore than they already are. They listen to our phone calls, check our emails and peek every dam where. Yes they are in most cars but bb is getting ridiculous in what is supposed to be a free county.
__________________
|
12-08-2012, 01:16 PM | #10 |
Drives: 69 Camaro I6 no prob,11 V6 big prob Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 475
|
waiting on the side for the aftermarket to come up with a pigtail that piggyback plugs in and will zap the black box in the event a incident occurred. Effectively erasing all data in the black box that you own inside your own car.
Now if it's leased, rented, company, agency, state or federally owned car the driver might not have any rights as they do not "own" the car. |
12-08-2012, 01:18 PM | #11 | |
Drives: 2006 Silverado SS, 2009 G8 GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 13,313
|
Quote:
It only records the information from a few seconds before and after a "event". If your not doing anything wrong it doesn't matter anyway..... |
|
12-08-2012, 01:26 PM | #12 |
Drives: 2SS/RS Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 7,181
|
Go ahead and remove it. You won't have an operable vehicle when you do as it is an integral part of the computer system. The Camaro already has one so I guess you'll be taking it out?
Getting a court order to read someone's black box is very complicated and the only times I've ever seen the order given was when someone died cause of the accident. So if you are ever in the position to have your black box read you will either be dead or in jail facing charges. Oh and P.S. All GM vehicles since 1990 has one and over 90% of vehicles sold in the US since 1995 have one as well. So if anyone is against the idea better sell any new vehicles they may own and buy a vehicle made before 1990. |
12-08-2012, 01:32 PM | #13 |
Drives: Exige, Miata, Ghia Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: CA, Bay Area
Posts: 2,309
|
Safety for liberty....hmmm....where have I heard that one before...
|
12-08-2012, 01:32 PM | #14 | |
Drives: 2SS/RS Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 7,181
|
Quote:
This piece of legislation is pointless as it won't achieve anything because what it is asking for is already in place. |
|
Post Reply
|
|
|