Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Phastek Performance


View Poll Results: Tacky or cool
Tacky 35 81.40%
Cool 8 18.60%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-17-2015, 10:25 AM   #29
FenwickHockey65
General Motors Aficionado
 
FenwickHockey65's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 GMC Canyon, 2020 Colorado
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 37,371
Send a message via AIM to FenwickHockey65
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastball View Post
I can go with modern font for the engine size, but the classic "SS" font is cool no matter what year it is. It's timeless. At least to me it is.
It's timeless on cars from that era. It looks out of place on modern cars IMO.
__________________
2023 GMC Canyon Elevation
2020 Chevrolet Colorado W/T Extended Cab (State-issued)
FenwickHockey65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2015, 03:34 PM   #30
amerhash28
 
amerhash28's Avatar
 
Drives: camaros in his dreams
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: dubai,UAE
Posts: 512
I think the camaro logo on each side is perfectly matched to the car so maybe add a 455 or the 4th gen camaro under it.the car looks great stock but a gloss roof and CF spoiler wrap would make it even better
amerhash28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2015, 05:11 PM   #31
fastball
Banned
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS 6MT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snoman View Post
CU died sometime in the 90's, I would put something related to the motor class or liter size.

Personally, badging sucks - 100% shaved on all sides here, no chev embl, no SS, no camaro, nadda, ziltch, zeromundo
I've seen debadged cars. They look naked and incomplete.

A car needs the right amount of classy and restrained badging.
fastball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2015, 08:49 AM   #32
1LEdabeast1LE
Nic@Night
 
1LEdabeast1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro 1SS/RS 1LE
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastball View Post
That's not a bad idea either, SS 6.2.

I wish car companies stuck with the cubic inches though.


I have 6.2LS3 on my fenders

Sent from my Z970 using Tapatalk
__________________
Breaking Ford owner's hearts, one light at a time
1LEdabeast1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2015, 08:52 AM   #33
1LEdabeast1LE
Nic@Night
 
1LEdabeast1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro 1SS/RS 1LE
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1LEdabeast1LE View Post


I have 6.2LS3 on my fenders

Sent from my Z970 using Tapatalk


Sent from my Z970 using Tapatalk
__________________
Breaking Ford owner's hearts, one light at a time
1LEdabeast1LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2015, 12:29 PM   #34
GMGP5X
 
GMGP5X's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2LT RS VR 2008 Silverado 2500
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Florissant,Mo
Posts: 580
Our get a group buy together and get some Team LT1 badges made like these LLT badges we had made.
Attached Images
 
__________________
2LT RS VR / ARK DTS Cat back exhaust / Roto-Fab CAI / RPI stealth mud guards /Defender works billet chrome door sills/ DIY painted engine cover, trunk corners, and brake rotors / RX catch can / Team LLT badges. Team LLT
GMGP5X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2015, 02:26 PM   #35
Mr Twisty


 
Mr Twisty's Avatar
 
Drives: the 2nd amendment home
Join Date: May 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 14,707
Quote:
Originally Posted by amerhash28 View Post
First of all I don't think anyone use cubic inch units anymore(except for the 392 SRT which sounds cool when you say it)this engine is known as LT1 BUT LT1 is not that cool so I think just SS is good enough(remove it from the rear bumper an put it on the fender).thatd my opinion for the badge
The LT1 actually has an excellent history with GM. Hate to disagree, but the LT1 in each iteration was VERY cool...
(from WIKI)
Quote:
LT-1
Years: 1970–1972
The LT-1 was the ultimate 350 cu in (5.7 L) V8, becoming available in 1970. It used solid lifters, 11:1 compression, a high-performance camshaft, and a 780 CFM Holley four-barrel carburetor on a special aluminum intake with ramhorn exhaust manifolds and a low-restriction exhaust to produce a factory rated 370 hp (276 kW) (the NHRA rated it at 425 hp for classification purposes) and 380 lb·ft (515 N·m). Redline was 6500 rpm but power fell off significantly past 6200 rpm.

The LT-1 was available on the Corvette and Camaro Z28.
Quote:
In 1992, GM created a new-generation small-block engine called the "LT1 350", not to be confused with the high-output Generation I LT-1 of the 1970s. It displaced 5.7 L (350 cu in), and was a 2-valve pushrod design. The LT1 used a reverse-flow cooling system which cooled the cylinder heads first, maintaining lower cylinder temperatures and allowing the engine to run at a higher compression than its immediate predecessors.
Quote:
The C7's all-new LT1 6.2L Small Block V-8 engine develops 455 horsepower (339 kW) and 460 pound-feet (620 N·m) torque, which can accelerate the Corvette from 0-60 mph in 3.8 seconds.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
Mr Twisty is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.