02-27-2017, 01:01 PM | #43 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2.0T RS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,827
|
Quote:
I take back what I said, I would happily give up 15-25 peak horsepower for a quicker spooling turbo anyday... I was under the impression the hp delta was more like 60-80 hp EFR 7163 for the win! 20hp is nothing some meth or nitrious won't make up For guys just wanting that high rpm power after 4200rpm the 7670 takes over (great for drag), Off the line though all else being equal the 7670 won't hold a candle to the 7163.... Look at the power difference between 3k and 4k! |
|
02-28-2017, 03:18 PM | #44 |
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
|
After a bit of researching, I'm thinking the 7163 G w/ the T4 flange is probably the way to go. It's the shortest of the three 7163 models I see listed on the BW website, which is good for packaging...
I had planned on the turbo header project at some point... But a big part of my wonders if it's really necessary? An adapter plate could easily be machined to bolt the T4 flange right onto the stock exhaust manifold, then just modify everything else to fit. Really wouldn't be that hard... But I also wonder what could be left on the table by doing that vs. a tubular header? I've been speaking to a guy off of the Caddy forum for quite a while now, he told me about a vendor that had done a custom BW EFR turbo install (didn't catch which model EFR turbo it was though), and it only made 365hp... But the question is... why? |
02-28-2017, 03:49 PM | #45 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2.0T RS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,827
|
Quote:
...365whp would be a nice upgrade, I don't see the point of the expense that would've been incurred by doing a custom header/turbo package though... Surely that power level (or damn close) could've been achieved with a competent bolt on package and a tune? To many questions... |
|
02-28-2017, 05:35 PM | #46 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
|
Quote:
I'd love to see someone get to 365whp with tuning and bolt-on's. Are you including a re-wheel in your estimation of bolt-on's? Because that would make it way easier! |
|
02-28-2017, 05:36 PM | #47 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
|
Quote:
|
|
02-28-2017, 06:16 PM | #48 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2.0T RS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,827
|
Quote:
...about the other... In all honesty I'm only guessing, but now thinking about it... It would be a considerable effort to squeeze another 120whp out of the stock turbo. I think airways into and out of the turbo would need to be optimised; also from the compressor forward to (and possibly including) the throttle body. I'd upgrade the intercooler in that line up also (if possible without excess psi drop), but leave the intake manifold alone. Beyond a good tune I still think E85/race gas would be required... I think that is what I'd try with, just a guess as I've never done this If you were close and needed the push, throw some meth and cutouts in there If that wouldn't do it... Then I guess you're stuck |
|
02-28-2017, 06:41 PM | #49 | |
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
|
Quote:
Yes, lt1z350 is the one that told me that. I don't think it was the ZZP build, I'm assuming it was the other guy as that's who we were talking about at the time, but he didn't say. I've got an email in to him right now waiting to find out who built the setup. |
|
03-01-2017, 11:13 AM | #50 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
|
Quote:
|
|
03-01-2017, 11:19 AM | #51 |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2.0T RS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,827
|
|
03-01-2017, 12:01 PM | #52 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
|
Quote:
http://www.cadillacforums.com/forums...y-2-0-ats.html |
|
03-01-2017, 12:09 PM | #53 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
|
Quote:
|
|
03-01-2017, 12:34 PM | #54 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2.0T RS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,827
|
Quote:
Also seems like my 'fantasy build' to get 365hp from the stock turbo wasn't too far off... Might land around 320-340hp, not bad for a guess I'd say... |
|
03-01-2017, 12:56 PM | #55 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro; 2017 Acadia Denali Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Chicago, IL/Williams Bay WI
Posts: 1,022
|
Quote:
I'd also like to go max effort. I've kept my eye open for a full tube frame chassis. Engine swaps are easy for me. So you might see an LTG in a notch back Mustang, or 80's Malibu, or whatever I can find cheap! I've especially been looking for flood damaged 6th Gen Camaros, ATS Coupes, and C7 Corvettes.... I'd really love to put an LTG into a C7 Vette. That would be so much fun! A bunch of the Caddy guys want to see the max effort build done with an ATS because it would be cool to see the exhaust shooting out the hood of a Caddy. |
|
03-01-2017, 01:21 PM | #56 | |
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2.0T RS Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,827
|
Quote:
Who wouldn't want to see a demonic flame spewing caddy?! I'd personally love to match my old man's best time in his 76' Camaro... 10.90s @125mph |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|