11-12-2017, 07:51 AM | #1 |
Drives: 2015 Camaro SS Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 713
|
G-Force or DSS
Finally decided to upgrade axles and driveshaft before I snap another one. Undecided on which one.What are the pros and cons to having a cv joint on the driveshaft.? ..Im at 494/478 launching on 18" Nitto 555R
__________________
2015 Camaro 2SS Cam/Heads/FBO 498/447 SAE |
11-13-2017, 09:52 PM | #2 |
Fast Cars and Old Guitars
Drives: 2015 2SS RS (L99, baby!) Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: N. CA
Posts: 3,973
|
I presume you’re talking high speed, Rzeppa CV type joints for the ‘driveshaft.’ Typically, these are better suited for lower angle/RPM applications. You do see them in lower angle, rear wheel drive drivelines (like a Jeep JK) but they seem to have a finite life on the main driveline. If spec’d properly for axle shafts, they’re awesome, due mainly to the lower rpm nature of an axle.
In a stock Camaro, there is very little driveline angle but the higher rpm and torque make it better suited for the OE flex disks or cardan style u-joints than a 6-ball CV. So I don’t really see any adavatages for a CV at all in a Camaro given the relative low angles. CV’s were developed to eliminate the tortional vibrations associated with single u joints through an angle. It’s why the OE flex disks work well - low angles. For higher HP cars, some shops have made aluminum shafts in 1350 series with single cardan style u-joints with good success. I’m told though that given the need for flex disk adapters on each end, (to mount standard flange yokes to the existing trans and diff disk flange) there is no significant weight advantage to this style shaft when all is said and done. But it is beefier and can handle upwards of 700-800 HP fairly easily.
__________________
“I don’t want to belong to any club that would have me as a member.” - Groucho Marx
Last edited by Moto-Mojo; 11-13-2017 at 10:03 PM. |
11-13-2017, 09:53 PM | #3 |
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Victory Red Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 921
|
My car is at 430rwhp with heavy Hurst Stunners and lowered 2" so I'm putting a lot of torsional and angular stress on the 1200hp G-force axles without issue. The stock axles would snap as soon as you tried to launch it.
__________________
Updates: BTR Stage 2 VVT Cam Kit w/Smith Brothers Trunnions, Fluidampr, RX catch can, B&M Trans pan mod, Kooks Black Headers, Borla S-tunes, Eibach Multi-Pro-R2 coilovers and Swaybars, BMR Full Bushing kit with Toe and Trailing arms, RB Rotors w/EBC Pads, GForce 1400 Axles (now on order). AVH-X5800BHS in Scosche GM5201AB. |
11-13-2017, 10:15 PM | #4 |
Served USN - Atomic Chimp
Drives: 13 Camaro LSX434 TT M6, 21 ZLE A10 Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 1,605
|
Stronger axles are essential with modded 5th Gens. It seems like the order of failures is axles, differential then, well, never heard of a stock driveshaft breaking. But, then again, I think folks swap it out with the other changes (axles and diff).
Whether Geforce or DSS, both are quality, and both back there products.
__________________
In excess of 1,000WHP LSX434 | AGP 65/65 TT | BTR Equalizer Intake | Trickflow 245cc cathedral | BTR custom cam | Cortex EBC | n2mb WOT | ID-1700x | Brisk GR12S | RPM Lv 7 TR6060 | AGP's Triple 525LPH Fore Fuel | Monster LT1-S Triple | 4.11 DSS Proform 9", CF driveshaft, 1400hp axles | Hurst Line Lock | MGW Retro Short Throw w/old skool Hurst T-handle | ADM solid subframe mounts | Prothane Motor Mounts | Revshift Poly Trans insert | Moreno camber/caster plates |
11-13-2017, 11:05 PM | #5 |
Drives: 2010 SS 2SS M6 Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Smithsburg, Md.
Posts: 2,445
|
5k plus launch, mod's in sig, hop breaks axles...
__________________
2010 SS 2SS M6 - Tune by RDP dynoSteve!(Woot) - Daily Driver - 150K! - All work by me...
|
|
|
|
|