Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-01-2015, 01:41 PM   #15
Marine Corps

 
Drives: 2016 2SS Garnet Red Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: San Francisco Bay
Posts: 840
LT Engine

The engine in question is one of the best in production. I don't think Motor Trend's recent article about the engine is any big thing. Nothing human-made is going to be perfect in all circumstances all the time. "Stuff Happens".
Marine Corps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 01:47 PM   #16
Memphis43

 
Memphis43's Avatar
 
Drives: Chevy
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marine Corps View Post
The engine in question is one of the best in production. I don't think Motor Trend's recent article about the engine is any big thing. Nothing human-made is going to be perfect in all circumstances all the time. "Stuff Happens".

Except it's happened multiple times with the Z06.

Honestly I think the packaging is the problem.

Mentioned this over on the Mustang site.

There is literally trouble getting the air into the vehicle because of its aerodynamics.

The CTS-V has not had any issues at all.

It has much better area for air to go in and it's aerodynamics actually allow for air to go into the engine bay.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Memphis43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 01:49 PM   #17
iPODFAN11

 
iPODFAN11's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 Shock ZL1
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: here
Posts: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waiting46 View Post
they explained that it was an issue with the tapping of the oil filter threads (when they actually cut the threads in to the block) the cleaning process was not as thorough as it should have been, leaving metal flakes in the oil that caused the issue. Sounds totally reasonable from a manufacturing standpoint, if a huge issue from a QC standpoint.
No threads in the block for the filter that I know of. LS and LT use a double threaded insert that screws into the oil pan and the filter screws to the other end.
__________________
From Super Chevy mag, April 2002: "Most of the weekend Settlemeire was meeting and greeting and quickly became known as simply "The Camaro Dude" (note, even his initials are SS)."

Quote:
Originally Posted by fbodfather View Post
we're certainly looking at it -- but right now, the emphasis MUST be on getting the Camaro V6 and SS out -- and having it exceed your expectations....

Once that's done....................
iPODFAN11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 01:50 PM   #18
fastball
Banned
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS 6MT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,372
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marine Corps View Post
The engine in question is one of the best in production. I don't think Motor Trend's recent article about the engine is any big thing. Nothing human-made is going to be perfect in all circumstances all the time. "Stuff Happens".
No, it doesn't. Not when you're banking your reputation on it.

This is the kind of thing that happens during R&D, not in the hands of a customer. Iron this crap out BEFORE the first one hits the showroom floor.

Inexcusable.
fastball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 01:58 PM   #19
kain279
 
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 45
Nice that the Corvettes got to be the guinea pigs for the new engines.

By the time the Camaro hits the bugs should be worked out.
kain279 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 02:06 PM   #20
pdoherty972
 
Drives: 2013 370Z sports
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Dallas
Posts: 169
Did you guys miss this?

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/bus...ites/71865642/

Quote:
Imagine Target trumping Saks Fifth Avenue. Timex outshining Rolex. Chevy beating Lamborghini.
Actually, that last one should come as no surprise. The Chevrolet Corvette has added to its status as the world’s most affordable supercar as it emerged the king of the 2015 Car and Driver Lightning Lap competition at Virginia International Raceway. It outran such thoroughbreds as the $353,115 McLaren 650S Spider, $274,120 Lamborghini Huracan and $163,000 Porsche 911 GT3.


So quick was the $100,245 Z06 — Corvette’s 650-horsepower performance model — that in the nine-year history of the famed Lightning Lap only one car has ever recorded a faster time: the 2014 Porsche 918 hybrid, a carbon-fiber cyborg from the future that costs nearly nine times as much the Corvette. The $875,175 Porsche was faster by a mere 1.5 seconds.
pdoherty972 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 02:09 PM   #21
Memphis43

 
Memphis43's Avatar
 
Drives: Chevy
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 794
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdoherty972 View Post

I think it may be the same car.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Memphis43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 02:10 PM   #22
SuperSound


 
SuperSound's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 5,063
Of note, both of C&D's C7s were Z51, which is dry sump. The 6th gen LT1 is wet sump. Not sure if that has anything to do with it but I haven't heard any wet sump motors blowing yet.

I agree LT4 issues appear to be packaging mainly. Won't know until more CTS-Vs and LT4 Camaro get out there.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3

"Voices in your head are not considered insider information."

3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!)
6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!)
SuperSound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 02:15 PM   #23
BahamaTodd

 
BahamaTodd's Avatar
 
Drives: 08 Accord V6/M6 / 04 Canyon Z71
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,078
Maybe I'm missing something, but aren't there two different issues?

There were engines that were blowing up where the problem was the metal flakes.

The other issue is with the engine not producing power. I don't think GM has done anything about that. That's what we are seeing in these media tests.
BahamaTodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 02:17 PM   #24
SuperSound


 
SuperSound's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 5,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by BahamaTodd View Post
Maybe I'm missing something, but aren't there two different issues?

There were engines that were blowing up where the problem was the metal flakes.

The other issue is with the engine not producing power. I don't think GM has done anything about that. That's what we are seeing in these media tests.
The first one is related to LT1s. The second to LT4s in the ZO6. Based what I've seen. So not really two issues since different engines.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3

"Voices in your head are not considered insider information."

3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!)
6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!)
SuperSound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 02:22 PM   #25
mt3130

 
Drives: Coupeless :(
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: SWFL
Posts: 980
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastball View Post
This mentality isn't the best. I submit that a well engineered, well built engine should last 200,000+ miles with proper recommended, scheduled maintenance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fastball View Post
No, it doesn't. Not when you're banking your reputation on it.

This is the kind of thing that happens during R&D, not in the hands of a customer. Iron this crap out BEFORE the first one hits the showroom floor.

Inexcusable.
I agree with you that this is inexcusable, and that these issues should be ironed out already. I'm also saying that this wouldn't stop me from buying the Camaro, because I have a warranty. Additionally, my car will never be driven at its limits, making the outcome seen in the video even less likely to occur.

If it's really a concern, I'll up the warranty to $100k miles, then dump the car before the warranty runs out if I start having issues.
mt3130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 02:31 PM   #26
chain777
 
Drives: Slow
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Metro Chicago,Illinois
Posts: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marine Corps View Post
The engine in question is one of the best in production. I don't think Motor Trend's recent article about the engine is any big thing. Nothing human-made is going to be perfect in all circumstances all the time. "Stuff Happens".
This isn't the first time MT had a problem with the Corvette, it's the forth time.

(copied from corvette forum):

Keeping count, this is actually the 4th time that Motor Trend has had a negative report on the Z06.

1. Randy Pobst overheated the Z06 on Road Atlanta.
2. The Nissan GT-R beat the Z06 at Willow Springs. Got a bad write-up about handling. Found to be bad alignment, another car was sent later and re-tested, which did better.
3. Carlos Lagos overheated the Z06 doing timed figure-8 laps.
4. This DNF Laguna Seca article.


I think MT at this point thinks it's a big thing that Z06s keep failing.
chain777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 02:36 PM   #27
BahamaTodd

 
BahamaTodd's Avatar
 
Drives: 08 Accord V6/M6 / 04 Canyon Z71
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,078
Well this is seems to be more of a Z06 issue rather than LT4 since we're not seeing these problems with the CTS-V. The Camaro with the LT4 should hopefully be fine.
BahamaTodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 02:41 PM   #28
oneredry
HYPER SS
 
oneredry's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Supercharged 2SS
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Troy OH
Posts: 1,252
Didn't MT state the most recent "limping around the track" caused by bad fuel? Something about the previous people who used it filled up with Chevron fuel 89 octane.
oneredry is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.