Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum


Bigwormgraphix


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-01-2015, 11:05 AM   #1
vtirocz


 
vtirocz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS M6
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,460
Anyone else concerned with LT engine issues during magazine testing

Most recently the Z06 had major engine related issues during Motor Trend's Best Driver's car comparison. A 2014 Stingray blew an engine during Car and Driver's lightning lap. And C&Ds long term 2014 Stingray blew an engine.

What's going on here?!?

I'm a little bit concerned that the LT1/4 are not as reliable/durable as the LS3. I never recall magazines having any engine related issues with the LS3, but seems to be a trend with the LT engines. I'm hoping they get these issues sorted out quickly!
vtirocz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 11:32 AM   #2
kain279
 
Drives: 335i
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 45
I think one was due to a faulty oil filter, no fault of the engine.

That's why I never buy Fram--they have grenaded plenty of perfectly good engines.
kain279 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 11:37 AM   #3
brutusvk

 
Drives: future 2016 SS
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 847
This was addressed months ago. Had to do with metal getting into the filter. They recommended all new stingrays basically do an oil change immediately after taking delivery or 500 miles. (Or something like that)
brutusvk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 11:38 AM   #4
mt3130

 
Drives: Coupeless :(
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: SWFL
Posts: 980
This is why your have a warranty. It may have been an issue early on, but I haven't heard much about it recently.

If you are concerned, get an extended warranty if you plan on keeping your car a long time.
mt3130 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 11:42 AM   #5
vtirocz


 
vtirocz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS M6
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by kain279 View Post
I think one was due to a faulty oil filter, no fault of the engine.

That's why I never buy Fram--they have grenaded plenty of perfectly good engines.
I'm skeptical that the oil filter was the real assignable cause of the engine failures. That seems like a PR response to downplay the issue and make it seem like it's not a big deal.
vtirocz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 11:46 AM   #6
vtirocz


 
vtirocz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS M6
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by mt3130 View Post
This is why your have a warranty. It may have been an issue early on, but I haven't heard much about it recently.

If you are concerned, get an extended warranty if you plan on keeping your car a long time.
The most recent issue of Z06 running poorly during the Best Driver's Car comparison just happened. The article is now on Motor Trend's site.

Hopefully they get everything sorted out ASAP.
vtirocz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 12:01 PM   #7
BahamaTodd

 
BahamaTodd's Avatar
 
Drives: 08 Accord V6/M6 / 04 Canyon Z71
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,078
Motor Trend track video:
https://youtu.be/dguUQUq8JL8

Randy was very disappointed.
BahamaTodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 12:05 PM   #8
BahamaTodd

 
BahamaTodd's Avatar
 
Drives: 08 Accord V6/M6 / 04 Canyon Z71
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 1,078
The Mercedes-AMG GT S won btw.
BahamaTodd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 12:44 PM   #9
Denis


 
Denis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Yorktown Heights, NY
Posts: 7,695
it is a little unsettling
__________________
Denis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 12:54 PM   #10
Waiting46
 
Drives: 1981 silver corvette,Hyper Blue 2SS
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 625
they explained that it was an issue with the tapping of the oil filter threads (when they actually cut the threads in to the block) the cleaning process was not as thorough as it should have been, leaving metal flakes in the oil that caused the issue. Sounds totally reasonable from a manufacturing standpoint, if a huge issue from a QC standpoint.
Waiting46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 01:01 PM   #11
fastball
Banned
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 2SS 6MT
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 4,372
Quote:
Originally Posted by mt3130 View Post
This is why your have a warranty. It may have been an issue early on, but I haven't heard much about it recently.

If you are concerned, get an extended warranty if you plan on keeping your car a long time.
This mentality isn't the best. I submit that a well engineered, well built engine should last 200,000+ miles with proper recommended, scheduled maintenance.
fastball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 01:03 PM   #12
Blackdevil77

 
Blackdevil77's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Pontiac G8 GT, Shelby GT500
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,376
Yes it's unsettling. I was hoping they'd have the kinks worked out by now.

The Z06 story recently is very disappointing and embarrassing. They really need to do something about the LT4.
Blackdevil77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 01:06 PM   #13
Suntan
 
Drives: 2006 BMW 330i, 2006 BMW 550i
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by BahamaTodd View Post
Motor Trend track video:
https://youtu.be/dguUQUq8JL8

Randy was very disappointed.
That's really odd, isn't it? Why would GM send MT a car that Randy concludes is obviously faulty?? Surely GM would have engineers on-site to address these concerns (maybe ask for another run!) since this is a pretty influential magazine...
Suntan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2015, 01:11 PM   #14
vtirocz


 
vtirocz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro 1SS M6
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Indy
Posts: 2,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suntan View Post
That's really odd, isn't it? Why would GM send MT a car that Randy concludes is obviously faulty?? Surely GM would have engineers on-site to address these concerns (maybe ask for another run!) since this is a pretty influential magazine...
The article states that GM techs were on site and could not figure out what the problem was. That's really embarrassing!

"So it was disappointing to see Big Nasty sidelined by a mysterious engine problem not even the GM techs on hand could figure out."
vtirocz is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.