08-09-2015, 07:01 PM | #15 |
Drives: 2012 1SS, 6spd. many mods 478 rwhp Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Harrisburg Pa.
Posts: 283
|
Yeah, how do we know that oil in the op's pic really came out of a catch can. He probably works for a catch can company. Don't fall for this trick.
Just because I get oil out of my Ls3's can doesn't mean it actually works. Er, no, wait a minute. Now I'm confused. |
08-10-2015, 08:35 AM | #16 |
Drives: 2013 1SS 1LE Black - Std Exhaust Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Brunswick, GA
Posts: 3,622
|
We have logged just about 450,000 non-direct injected miles on our last three cars ('93 Z/28, '01 WS6, and the current '13 1LE) and have not had one engine related issue. All three of these cars were / are driven hard. Lets add the 230,000 miles on my wifes '01 Tahoe that we just parted with. Again, no engine related issues. Did the Z, the WS6 and the Tahoe have reduced power when we got rid of them compared to when they were new....yes sir, but they all had 200,000 plus hard miles on them. I am a firm believer that a catch can is just about as important to a non-direct-injected engine as a big pink stripe down the hood is, but if you like pink stripes, go for it!
|
08-10-2015, 10:36 AM | #17 |
Destroyed by flooding
Drives: Wife's car Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,673
|
5,541 miles and got this much snake oil! CC or bottoms up, your choice...
__________________
|
08-10-2015, 12:08 PM | #18 |
Drives: 1LE Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: East Coast Man
Posts: 550
|
Yea, I'm getting about an ounce of oil in the CC every 1000 miles. If that is an 8 ounce glass you have there, you are seeing about the same . . . and I don't want it in the intake. Admittedly, I would expect the amount would go down over time as the engine gets more broken in (only 3500 miles on my car).As someone else said, I get where it is debatable whether the oil hurts anything. But, unless someone wants to make the case that the oil is actually good for the engine, I'm keeping it out!
|
08-10-2015, 12:13 PM | #19 | |
MY SS is SOLD
Drives: AGM 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS L99 Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Southwest Illinois
Posts: 1,838
|
Quote:
Off topic question. In that second pic, what is that hole in the rear of the stock air box? I don't remember mine having that.
__________________
CAI, Dynatech Headers, HF Cats, JRE Tuned, Corsa Cat Back, Strut Tower Brace.
|
|
08-10-2015, 12:18 PM | #20 |
Drives: 2013 Camaro Dusk 2SS/6 Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,586
|
I'm not saying it's a bad thing, but the catch cans are basically "oil condensers". That oil is in droplet/vapor form and the catch can is basically a big pressure drop, which cools the air, and condenses the oil.
I tend to think it's not a big deal to let that vapor stream go into the intake on the V8 engines. The majority of it will just burn and never condense... and since it's not a DI engine the fuel keeps things clean for whatever oil there is. So just because you catching oil, that doesn't mean you prevented some huge oil buildup problem. On the DI engines, yea maybe... but not the V8 engines. |
08-10-2015, 09:42 PM | #21 |
"Off topic question. In that second pic, what is that hole in the rear of the stock air box? I don't remember mine having that."
Not sure, it's not actually a hole either. Maybe it is stub that you can hook a hose up to extend into the cabin so you can actually hear the otherwise silent intake. Or it could be an attachment point to hook up a leaf blower |
|
08-11-2015, 01:51 AM | #22 | |
The Dude
Drives: 2013 Camaro 1SS M6 Join Date: May 2013
Location: San Diego, Cali.
Posts: 364
|
Quote:
__________________
CAE intake, Borla Type S exhaust, TSP LT headers, stage 2 CMS cam tuned by Ryne, MGW short shifter, Carbon fiber Anvil trunk spoiler, Havoc rear diffuser with carbon fiber insert, GM GFX side skirts, ACS T4 front lip spoiler, 20" MRR 228 Gloss Black Wheels wrapped in Nitto INVO rubber, carbon fiber radio fin, Wilpak black rear window louvers.
|
|
08-16-2015, 08:08 AM | #23 |
Drives: 2020 rally green rs Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Naples Florida
Posts: 1,159
|
Here is my question-without a catch can-will the motor seize up,blow up, lose power fail completely burn oil?
|
08-16-2015, 08:40 AM | #24 | |
Older Than Dirt
Drives: 2010 & 2013 Camaros Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 4,564
|
Quote:
Think of it like brake dust. Brake dust build up a little at a time is no big deal. But when you don't periodically clean it off, over time, it could build up and potentially cause harm to your wheel balance and plain isn't attractive. But yet I'm betting some of the poo-pooers go to GREAT lengths to keep the brake dust off their wheels, yet don't understand why the people that want to keep their cars clean inside and out wish to run a catch can. Their reasoning escapes me. They've probably spent at least as much as what a good catch can cost on brake dust repelling waxes, etc. or even some other "mod" that isn't required. I haven't bought into all the "magic bullets" people purchase for brake dust. I just wash with soap and water often, and brake dust is all gone. Is a catch can REQUIRED? NO. If you don't run a catch can, over time will oil build up inside the intake system? YES. Can excess oil cause problems? Over time, perhaps. Maybe not for a while, though. Or even as long as you own the car. Just like eating only 5 cheeseburgers won't clog arteries. But 5 cheeseburgers per day for 25 years probably wouldn't be good for you. Is the intake system where oil should normally be? NO. So, IMO, it should not be there. Catch can reduces that. Key point is to keep the can emptied periodically. If you don't do that, you'll definitely find out when it is too full.
__________________
2010 2SS TE, 1 of 822/2013 Camaro ZL1 vert, 1 of 54
|
|
08-17-2015, 03:49 PM | #25 |
Drives: 2020 rally green rs Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Naples Florida
Posts: 1,159
|
thanks for the answer guy,thats about what I thought about it.DO not have a catch can...yet with 7000 miles.
|
08-17-2015, 04:18 PM | #26 |
Drives: 2011 Green SS M6 Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: CleveBurbs Ohio
Posts: 669
|
Walking on the Wild Side here---None on mine either
|
08-17-2015, 04:29 PM | #27 |
Drives: 2012 45th Anniversary Edition Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,618
|
Just cant imagine, if they are as important as those are saying, GM has not addressed the issue... even in some kind of way.
|
08-17-2015, 04:34 PM | #28 | ||
SHKE BKE
Drives: 2013 Camaro Join Date: May 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 3,108
|
Quote:
Friends GMC Acadia had idling problems and ran like crap, took off the air cleaner and it was completely full of oil. You think pouring oil into your throttle body isn't harmful? Of course the car must have a huge blowby problem for that much oil to get into, such as a bad PCV valve, but having a catch can would've prevented the problem from getting so bad in the first place. Call it a scam if you want but anyone running forced induction, direct injection, or high performance at all should invest in a catch can unless they plan on getting rid of the car to scam some sucker. Quote:
Besides, if the problem doesn't occur for a good 100,000 miles (like I said long term) then why would GM care? They don't want you to have problems during your warranty, afterwards they want your business in parts sales. |
||
|
|
|
|