05-13-2016, 11:33 AM | #491 |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
|
If whatever this car being tested is powered by the LT4, that leaves no direct competitor for the GT350. Sure, the LT4 powered cars will likely be faster, as they should be. Yes, the 1LE may come close but 455 vs 526 hp is a big disparity to overcome. Depending on the power output of the next GT500, the LT4 cars may not even directly compete with it either.
__________________
|
05-13-2016, 11:42 AM | #492 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
However, GM can easily do a LS6 with the LT1. It wouldn't be a whole new engine and could easily bump the power to 515-520 while destroying the GT350 in TQ. |
|
05-13-2016, 11:45 AM | #493 |
HAMMER PILOT
Drives: 13 ZL1#182, 85 CJ7, 16 Silverado Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 4,386
|
The ZL1 will probably take care of the GT350. Z/28 targeting the Viper?
__________________
"DO YOU WANT ME TO PUT THE HAMMER DOWN?"
|
05-13-2016, 11:48 AM | #494 |
Drives: 2013 1LE Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DMV
Posts: 1,548
|
While being faster, it will not be able to sustain it. I bet it heat soaks and pulls timing after just a few laps. May not go full limp mode, but it won't run full power all day like a well engineered NA car.
__________________
It's a Dingledarm. It's there to dampen side fumbling. If your marzelvanes fumble too much they can cause total protonic reversal. It gets ugly from there. This is really the biggest problem with the new Camaro. That and the tri-pronged blivot.
Delivered 21 Jan 2013 |
05-13-2016, 11:50 AM | #495 |
HAMMER PILOT
Drives: 13 ZL1#182, 85 CJ7, 16 Silverado Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 4,386
|
You need to read up on the cooling enhancements going into the ZL1. I doubt heat soak will be an issue.
__________________
"DO YOU WANT ME TO PUT THE HAMMER DOWN?"
|
05-13-2016, 11:51 AM | #496 |
Drives: 2014 2LS (traded in) 2015 1SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 2,132
|
Not trying to argue here, just discussing. I really don't think developing a HIPO NA motor that meets current and future CAFE/ emissions is easy. They have to spread out the R&D of the new powerplant over the course of its expected life and make a profit with it. If they develop this hypothetical motor and it's only got a life span of a couple years due to future emissions and it only goes into a couple track type cars the costs would be astronomical. I'd like to see some magic secret NA motor as much as anyone so I hope y'all are right
__________________
|
05-13-2016, 11:55 AM | #497 |
Drives: Camaro Justice Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,174
|
There used to be a fixed hierarchy in GM protecting the Corvette as King. That is no longer the case. TEAM Camaro has no restrictions placed on them to protect the Corvette. If TEAM Camaro can develop a faster Camaro, they are free to do so. That was clear when the 5th Gen Z/28 ran stunning times at the Ring. What holds TEAM Camaro back are sticker price and a back seat. Kudos to TEAM Camaro for pushing the limits on all levels to produce stunning performance numbers that rival the Corvette.
|
05-13-2016, 11:55 AM | #498 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
Emissions is not that big of a problem when you are shooting for 500-525 HP. Now, when you have goals of 575-600 N/A HP like the Corvette team with the new Z06 and then it becomes a problem. |
|
05-13-2016, 11:59 AM | #499 | |
Drives: Camaro Justice Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 20,174
|
Quote:
Last edited by JusticePete; 05-13-2016 at 12:48 PM. |
|
05-13-2016, 11:59 AM | #500 | |
Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
|
Quote:
No, they can't do it easily. You're expecting over a 10% increase in power, closer to 13%, in a situation where GM is facing increasing fuel economy, emissions and other requirements. It IS easily doable if you didn't have to worry about emissions, fuel economy, very long term durability, etc.. A revised intake manifold, that meets OE requirements, is CAFE friendly, can pass CARB, etc..might add another 15 at the most. Stuff like the Holley and MSD intakes? Wouldn't pass muster at GM for mainline production. SO..a revised LTX might hit 485HP, but nowhere near 500+. |
|
05-13-2016, 12:03 PM | #501 | |
Drives: Current Camaro-less Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
|
Quote:
Emissions ARE a big deal on EVERY motor. It's not just one parameter of emissions they have to comply with..there are multiple realms that they have to test for, comply with, meet, etc. Emissions on a 6.2L 500+ HP car might be less of an issue now..but what about each successive year where they get stricter and stricter? GM can't build a motor for right now, they have to think years and years out. |
|
05-13-2016, 12:15 PM | #502 | |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
|
Quote:
Does building a Z/28 meant to compete with the GT350R mean it can't be better in every way and the best Camaro possible?
__________________
|
|
05-13-2016, 12:16 PM | #503 | |
Drives: 2014 2LS (traded in) 2015 1SS 1LE Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: New York
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
There's just NO WAY GM is doing all the required R&D and tooling up a plant to build a limited edition HIPO NA motor. If anything I bet we see more SC and turbos and smaller engines sooner than later. You want a big honkin NA V8 you better get it now.
__________________
|
|
05-13-2016, 12:17 PM | #504 | |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
|
Quote:
If this is a Z28, and it comes with the LT4, the reason is because that's all they had to use.
__________________
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|