05-20-2015, 11:51 PM | #15 |
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9 Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
|
Do you happen to know the trans ratios of the 6th gen vs the vette?
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
|
05-21-2015, 12:22 AM | #16 |
ConceptZer0
Drives: 68 427 Camaro, 11 2SS/RS, 13 ZL1 Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: nj
Posts: 1,096
|
You have a few L99 H/C, Bolt ons, and slick on the fast list currently In 10s... So I don't see why not.
|
05-21-2015, 12:47 AM | #17 | |
Drives: 2013 SS Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
05-21-2015, 12:48 AM | #18 | |
Drives: 2013 SS Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
|
Quote:
I'll hopefully be one to push it lol
__________________
|
|
05-21-2015, 06:57 AM | #19 | |
Drives: 2019 GT350 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang 2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock 2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s 2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s 2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned 1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot |
|
05-21-2015, 07:28 AM | #20 |
Do you even lift, bro?
|
__________________
My 1LE (645WHP/597WTQ) build/journal Thread:
1st ever 1LE COTW http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=255461 |
05-21-2015, 08:12 AM | #21 | |
Drives: 2022 F150, 87 Monte Carlo Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: MN
Posts: 1,267
|
Quote:
ATS-V got 2.85. 1-----2-----3-----4-----5-----6----7----8----R 4.56 2.97 2.08 1.69 1.27 1.00 0.85 0.65 3.82 1-----2-----3------4-------5-------6--------R 4.027 2.364 1.532 1.152 0.852 0.667 3.064 |
|
05-21-2015, 09:35 AM | #22 |
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9 Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
|
So the trans ratios are the same for all 3 cars? Figured they would have stepped up first and second gear in the camaro because of the extra weight.
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
|
05-21-2015, 09:46 AM | #23 |
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 605
|
|
05-21-2015, 09:37 PM | #24 | |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
Quote:
A stall where the tranny has to be removed and a gear swap that is obviously very pricey and time consuming. Far from just bolting it on. I just think it sounds funny when a guy talks about a car being only simple bolt on but had to spend thousands on labor and was unable to do it himself realistically. agree to disagree. I consider bolt ons exhaust, cai, bigs n littles, tune, pulleys, throttle body etc.... Stuff that can truly be bolted on and go in essence. Intake manifold I'm on the fence. Not removing a transmission and or a very expensive and technical gear swap most could never do themselves... * just for reference I do most all my own mods besides gear swaps and tuning. Have done 3-4 h/c builds on lsx vehicles including my own... I have full access to a shop full of tools and a hoist.... And I won't consider a stall or gears a bolt on. I know what's involved lol. I'd do a cam swap before I would attempt gears ( if you want it done right and to last that is) |
|
05-22-2015, 01:12 AM | #25 | |
Drives: 99z28 with bolt-ons and a mwc fab 9 Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,277
|
Quote:
__________________
I like my woman like my milk shakes, THICK!!!!
|
|
05-22-2015, 06:57 PM | #26 | |
Drives: 2013 SS Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
05-22-2015, 07:19 PM | #27 | |
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
|
Quote:
I don't always choose to follow norms or popular opinion. I was looking at well over 1000 dollars total price with parts to just switch gears on my 2010. Which still left it with a weak rear end and axles. Gears in my opinion were a big undertaking to do it right/ hold up to drag use. The term bolt on is misleading and why I take issue. It's just annoying when guys talk about their cars as just a bolt on car and boast it's incredible performance for only being " bolt on"... It downplays the time/ money/ effort that was put into the car... In turn inflating its image. This is even further blown out of proportion to the uninformed person. I'm wondering how easy it will be to remove the tranny in the 2016? Bet it won't be 300 dollar child's play that the average person will pay at a performance shop... Example...10 second bolt on mustang 5.0. Lot of the owners take it as meaning they can throw on a tire and do exhaust and tune and the car will run tens. I did some research... Just the tip of the ice burg for this to happen was 500 lbs weight reduction. Among a crap load of other small details people will overlook and simply call the car a "bolt on" performer. The work required deserves much more than this simple term in my opinion. Basically what I'm getting at is the term " bolt on" is misleading and infers simplicity and little effort to some people. Btw...300 labor for stall is bargain basement. The stalls themselves on top of that are about 1000 bucks. If the guy is good and did it right I wouldn't even do it myself if I could get it that cheap. I was a mechanic for ten years. The only tranny removal I did for 300 bucks was 700r4 on a Chevy truck lol. I charged around 500 on average (depends on car) and was cheaper than most people in my neck of the woods. I never tack on shop supplies or tax either... Like most places. I was Just a shade tree mechanic... Last edited by ULTRAZLS1; 05-22-2015 at 07:50 PM. |
|
05-22-2015, 08:04 PM | #28 | |
Drives: 2013 SS Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
|
Quote:
Not getting into a pissing match just stating my opinion
__________________
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|