Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger
2) Otherwise bump the 2.0 power a bit, and offer it for the same price as the V6, giving the buyers two good options based on their own preference. Frankly I'd love this approach.
|
I thought that was the whole reason we wouldn't see the LF3 in the Camaro? More expensive to produce with inferior HP, torque, and fuel economy compared to the LT1. It would be a different motor that would be fun to drive but the average Camaro owner is still stuck on rear drive V8 performance. I guess how they build and end up placing the turbo 4 will answer that. I'm all for options but they keep telling us about development costs driving up the overall price of the Camaro regardless of what model you choose.