Quote:
Originally Posted by aggieguy13
so they can VTEC it yo. so vtec can kick in, because people who talk about vtec are COMPELTELY AWARE that almost every car since 2000 that has fuel injection effectively has "vtec"
*sarcasm
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3
VTEC is variable valve timing, not fuel injection.
|
I'm not a Honda guy but VTEC is a LOT more than variable valve timing. For it's day, VTEC was one of the most incredible engine advances for a tiny little 4 banger since the overhead cam. It varies timing yes, but also has two totally separate cam profiles. The "VTEC kicked in yo!" people are mostly idiots but VTEC remains much more technologically advanced than other variable valve timing systems outside of extremely high end cars.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010-1SS-IBM
Would rather see a turbo 8 option than a turbo 4 option.
|
Duh? hahaa
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger
This thread just keeps on and keeps on lol.
It should be no shock to anyone here that a turbo 4 could run with or outrun a V6. Performance oriented turbo 4 engines these days are making 280 - 320 HP and that same amount in torque and also makes that torque at low rpms.
Compare that to a V6 which makes plenty of HP 323HP, but just 278 TQ and you can easily see how the turbo 4 could be quicker.
Throw a tune on the turbo 4 and suddenly your looking at TQ numbers closer to 400.
Yes right now the rumor mill seems to think the Mustang base car will be the V6, with the T4 being an optional engine which likely will have more torque, and better highway gas mileage.
I'd guess that GM is doing the same.
|
Yup. As long as there is always a bad a$$ v-8 performer to keep the spirit of this car alive who cares how many different engines they offer trying to get more sales? More sales equals never having to suffer through another hiatus like between 4th and 5th gens.