View Single Post
Old 09-22-2013, 04:15 PM   #103
kdepew
 
Drives: 1994 Mitsubishi 3000GT
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by *007 View Post
I really don't believe the new C7 could have been any better.
Design: It is superb and emotionally penetrating. Living "Art".
Quality: From base 1LT to 3LT is perfection at reasonable price.
Engineering/Powertrain: Leading edge. Room for improvement. Z51 Pkg awesome.

Regarding the "retro" discussions.. don't care which way they go. As long as they differentiate themselves with the "American Muscle" look and feel. The previous C6 was getting a bit euro. The sharpness and cues on the C7 have bridged back to "muscle"...
Again... wow! With the Z51, why would a ZR1 or Z07 really be necessary for the majority of folks? Home run Chevy. Covered enough bases in ONE model to appeal to 96% of buyers!

I'd sure like to see the new Gen6 Camaro do the same thing.
Saying the quality on the C7 is "perfection" is a bit premature given no one even has one yet. Going overboard like that suggests you aren't being very objective.

My opinion on the C7 (and I know that others will have differing opinions):
- Front looks good.
- Side looks mostly good. The area around the hatch doesn't look great to my eyes but looks OK.
- The rear is a design fail.
- The little Stingray/Guitar logo looks stupid and should go.
- Too many vents (functional on Z51 or not).
- Interior looks like a big step up from the previous generation.
- Power is fine. Not a big bump, but the C6 already had good power.
- Weight went up in the C7 which is a serious fail. The weight increase wasn't huge, but the weight should have come down. This concerns me from a Camaro perspective.
- I havent set in one, but from others that have it looks like the C7 compromised rear visibility which I don't like.

All in all, I think it is a great car except the rear is so ugly.
kdepew is offline   Reply With Quote