Quote:
Originally Posted by TrackClub
Thx for the brakes info!
Cem - I think when tire manufacturers speak about camber it is largely for F vs R. I have run aggressive camber before but always kept it about 1 apart F vs R. Just a hunch but if you go with such aggressive camber on R the car may not rotate well. High R camber suites mid and R engine cars better. Then again zero experience with 1LE yet so forgive my arm chair expertise here LOL!
|
Yes, I am more concerned about the front camber since it's the one that affects the handling/turning more and the required amount of camber or lack thereof.
As you may know, strut type suspension requires more camber to begin with as it won't maintain as much as the double wishbone setup. I wouldn't call the -3.0 aggressive (the min recommended amount for Hoosiers) , aggressive would be something like -3.7 camber like the DSSV allows or even more
