View Single Post
Old 10-06-2015, 02:09 PM   #14
xgnxs
 
xgnxs's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Cobalt Base - 5 speed
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 444
Quote:
Originally Posted by huggercamaro21 View Post
So the SS is at 405 to the wheels squared. What about the Mustang?
You are CLEARLY forgetting that GM is a bunch of liars and that this is a ringer sent to the magazines for better reviews, the 6th gen SS will not offer real world performance anywhere close to this and will actually make 203.78 hp and 201.59 tq to the rear wheels while weighing exactly 4,357.88 lbs, WITHOUT the high performance floor mats and paint finish, of course. The mustang, on the other hand, is actually far, far superior to what literally all of the reviews of it ever have said, and it more accurately makes 526.7 hp and 543.93 tq to the rear wheels, while weighing only 2357.22 lbs, as independently verified by my source and only my source but I have no proof so don't ask but you can totally believe me. That weight is actually INCLUDING the high speed wipers and cup holders. The SS will, in REAL WORLD testing (not by magazines, of course) run the 1/4 so slowly that time will actually go backward and it will literally never finish a single road course because the brakes are so bad they literally disintegrated into nothing after only being looked at harshly, I know this because my sources tell me so, while the mustang actually finished the quarter mile so quickly that its run was only recorded by ultra high speed cameras and its time couldn't even be verified, and it actually finished every road course simultaneously, it was that fast.
xgnxs is offline   Reply With Quote