Are you sure you're not a Mopar guy? This stuff is very Dodgy.
|
Quote:
|
D3 for me. I can imagine Chevy doing some kind of cool LED afterburner like effects with those tail lights.
|
I don't know. looks very mustang-ish, with the general shape and blacked out area
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...stang-rear.jpg |
Quote:
|
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
A little change on the exhaust.:biggrin:
|
D3, but take some height out of the car in the body.
|
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Attachment 551522 I'm not sure the quads work here; they make it look a little too busy to me. But that's just me. Attachment 551523 Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Attachment 551524 |
that front end is killer.
|
So when do you submit this for review to the Camaro team???
:thumbup: |
Quote:
|
This doesn't really matter much from a design perspective, but if something like this DID make production one thing that I think everyone would very much prefer is that the spoiler on the rear with the two raised ends, be a seperate, removable piece. I think you could have a spoiler that attaches to the trunk, that is low in the middle with two raised ends to achieve your desired look.
My reasoning is that if it is molded into the body, you a stuck with it. if it is damaged, you are stuck with it. If you want to change it or modify if...well, your stuck with it. Also, it would be easier for GM to add different types of spoilers depending on the car (base, SS, Z/28). Just a little thought I had while looking at the rear. I do like the spoiler though...not saying I'd want to change it out immediately or anything like that. I also feel that with rearend D3, dual tips on each side would look good. With the other rear end with the round tail lamps, it would likely look a bit redundant. |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Here's a preliminary front view based on the side and top views so these dimensions are pretty close to correct. Although I really like the SS logo in the front (and I think that's the way it should BE) I know they'd want to put the gold Chevy logo there instead so that's here in this view. I put the SS logo about where I'm guessing they'd put it...I don't know, maybe it should go a little higher. I can't decide if the running lights should be bigger, smaller or longer.... like I said this view is preliminary. Attachment 551657 |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Yeah on the back with the round tail lights there's just too much dual round going on visually I think. Here's the D3 view with the quads; works much better. Attachment 551664 |
1 Attachment(s)
Here is an idea I had for the front facia. Don't mind the crude shape of it, I made it in about 10 minutes on SolidWorks. I was going for a sort of stealth fighter look.
Attachment 551668 |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I really like the C2 taillights the best ('67 style), but I think they need to be a bit bigger. Unfortunately, that would be even closer to the Dodge's: |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I like the C2 back too but that one seems to have gotten the least amount of reaction for some reason. Here it is with the tail lights larger as you requested. Attachment 551729 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yeah. I was thinking of it as an evolution of the 14 refresh. |
1 Attachment(s)
Just for fun based on ssrs396's suggestion here are a couple ideas for the next generation of a car that isn't even out in it's first generation yet! :D The Z/28.
B2 is what ssrs396 mentioned. I also did a version from D3; other than the different tail lights D3 also has quad exhaust. Attachment 551820 |
Quote:
Hmmm what if D3 is the rally sport version and B2 is the regular Camaro, I have always felt that the RS package should be a little more dramatic and not just a small change, sort of like the hideaway headlights on a 67-69 Camaro. It probably might not be feasible but one can dream. Plus it would please both camps.:) |
Quote:
I'd like to see just one V6 base model with the standard package of power, handling, features, that could be usable as a daily driver or just an all-around town/travel car. It should have an upgraded interior; no more plain and LX. As nice an interior as any of the other models except it doesn't have the extra performance features/gauges/seats/seat belts etc. of the higher performance V8 models. The Rally Sport (RS) should be the base model with upgraded wheels, sways, handling and a little more power. This could be for the sporty driver around town but not really a track car. Add the 4 minor gauges. The Super Sport (SS) upgrades to the V8 and is aimed at straight line performance; not really a road course suspension but upgraded bushings and such for improved traction and control. The SS 1LE is the upgraded street performance/road course car. This car could be used in autocross or HPDE events. Upgraded seats with 5-point harness option, tow hooks, fire extinguisher, etc.... a genuine track pack/kit option. The ZL1 is an all-around high-performance GT. More power and torque than the SS; equal or better than the 1LE on the track due to its exotic magnetic suspension, yet the driver can adjust it for a street cruise every bit as comfortable as the base model if desired. Upgraded seats. The Z/28 is the road course track monster. Specialized and optimized for road course. Although it's street legal it's not really a street car...not for everyone. It would be nice if outwardly there were enough visual differences to distinguish the models besides just a badge or lettering. The fender flares and aero package would be enough for the 1LE and Z/28; maybe even have different spoilers for each so the Z/28 would get the more extreme track spoiler. The base model, RS and SS would not have the throttle-actuated hood vent; the 1LE, ZL1 and Z/28 would. Of course you could do things with wheels to distinguish the models. I'll work on visual ideas for the various models. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.