CAMARO6

CAMARO6 (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/index.php)
-   2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=155)
-   -   Who wants to see another V6 engine in the 6th gen?? (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=277052)

PYROLYSIS 02-15-2013 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMPrenger (Post 6165563)
Well, I've read that issue has finally been put to rest with the latest models, but yes...owners of vehicles using the LY7, or LLT from somewhere around mid 2000's through 2011, and MAYBE even the 2012 LFX have that to worry about.

But it should not be something to worry about for the future.

Come on GM...I want a 340HP V6 in a 3,400lb car, so I can mod it to 370 - 380 HP lol :D. That'd be one sweet little V6....all for mid to upper $20s

Yep. That would make a really fun daily driver. I would love to see a NA V-6 in the sixth gen myself.

TJ91 03-03-2013 08:40 PM

there will definitly be a v6 option

KMPrenger 03-04-2013 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TJ91 (Post 6241607)
there will definitly be a v6 option

I hope you are right. Time will tell!

v6_camaro 03-04-2013 03:42 PM

V8 is what most people dreamed of including myself when I bought my camaro but I settled for a V6 because of the $4.80/gallon here in SoCal. Besides, for most people 323 hp is more than enough. I also noticed the slight advantage with a V6 is that it's lighter and with suspension and intake upgrades, it's a good track car.

TJ91 03-04-2013 04:34 PM

Honestly the more I see it, look at all the V6s is in different cars, theyre putting out sold HP and fuel economy, I dont see why GM would remove the V6 option all together.
At the end of the day, the 2LS gets 30mpg
Cant expect a sports car to be getting 40mpg.
Thats why theyres different segments.
I think GM would be making a big mistake trying to dilute the Camaro for more fuel econ and yes I know the 4cyl Turbos can make a strong car but it also didnt make sense in the 5th gen, they tried it.
The v6 always seems to be the upper vairant to 4cyl models and I dont see that changing. Atleast I hope not.

Personally wouldnt want to HEAR a 4cyl Camaro, guess this is how the V8 guys feel about us :laugh:

90503 03-04-2013 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TJ91 (Post 6244963)
Honestly the more I see it, look at all the V6s is in different cars, theyre putting out sold HP and fuel economy, I dont see why GM would remove the V6 option all together.
At the end of the day, the 2LS gets 30mpg
Cant expect a sports car to be getting 40mpg.
Thats why theyres different segments.
I think GM would be making a big mistake trying to dilute the Camaro for more fuel econ and yes I know the 4cyl Turbos can make a strong car but it also didnt make sense in the 5th gen, they tried it.
The v6 always seems to be the upper vairant to 4cyl models and I dont see that changing. Atleast I hope not.

Personally wouldnt want to HEAR a 4cyl Camaro, guess this is how the V8 guys feel about us :laugh:

I hope they keep the V-6 as well...I sort of look at them these days as having the niche of the "small(er)" blocks that we can't get anymore...

With only one V-8 available, the V-6 more than amply fills the need for another engine option...Looks like the I-4 is gonna happen, just think if it kills the V-6, it's a classic case of fixing something that isn't broke...

90503 03-18-2013 12:07 PM

...New Caddy V-6 TT is out...looks awesome...

Norm Peterson 03-18-2013 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sspolo (Post 6158824)
One thing I would hate would be a 7 or 8 speed transmission since it would shift too much.

See if I've got this straight - people want tap-shift in order to emulate the 3-pedal conventional MT driving experience, but only to a point.


Quote:

Originally Posted by KMPrenger (Post 6160339)
Besides, if GM Camaro team is REALLY listening, as they have said they are, and the Camaro disciples have said they are, and Scott (Fbodfather) says they are, then this is a great outlet to show them what we want.

I'm sure that they're listening. What matters is how much weight they're willing to give the opinions of us enthusiasts relative to whatever the lowest-common-denominator transportation-appliance buyer expects.


Quote:

Originally Posted by TooCool5 (Post 6161817)
I'd like to see a Supercharged Direct Injection 3800 V6 as an option.
IMO one of the best engine built. :iono:

You do realize that the 3800/3.8/nee 231 is basically a late 1950's design, don't you? There is no longer sufficient reason for a V6 to have the V8's 90° design.


Quote:

Originally Posted by TJ91 (Post 6244963)
Personally wouldnt want to HEAR a 4cyl Camaro, guess this is how the V8 guys feel about us :laugh:

Sooner or later, somebody was going to say that. What's funny now that 4's of any configuration are likely, sixxer fans are actually starting to get support from the V8 segment.


Quote:

Originally Posted by trademaster (Post 6160955)
If the LT1 is 450hp and they offered a turbo 4 base engine, then maybe the tt 6 they have been working on around 370hp, that would be very cool.

TT to get only 370-ish HP because you can't be crowding the 450 HP V8 doesn't seem worth the effort. It would be even harder to justify as a midpoint between a NA V6 and the V8 than the NA V6 is between a turbo-4 and the V8.


Dunno, maybe an uprated NA V6 fitted as the manual transmission entry point and the turbo-4 with the automatics is a possibility. Still only two combinations to certify. The sixxer would be better at very low revs where you'd really rather not have to downshift no matter who you are (trust me on this point). And the AT would keep you out of such situations at least when driven in full automatic mode (like most buyers really would) and you'd be into boost almost instantly.


Norm

HDRDTD 03-18-2013 02:34 PM

Interesting.....
2014 Cadillac CTS to pack twin-turbo V6

Top engine option rated a 420 hp, uses 8-speed automatic


Read more: http://www.autoweek.com/article/2013...#ixzz2NvCpDLaI
Follow us: @AutoweekUSA on Twitter | AutoweekUSA on Facebook

Easy Go 03-19-2013 12:03 PM

With the next-gen architecture and thrust-to-weight ratio (not to mention fuel economy), only fringe Camaro customers (1%-ers?) would find a TT V6 "lacking". There's always the C7 Vette if "Ummmmm... well...... it's just not enough for me".

Having said that, the Camaro vs. Mustang rivalry might prompt V8 consideration amongst GM's "Car Guys and Gals".

We shall see...

MikeT 03-19-2013 08:57 PM

It'll be interesting to see it the TT V6 makes it into the next Camaro. My first instinct would be, no, it won't because TT V6 is going to be an expensive engine to build and the V8 offers similar performance for less money.

On the other hand, economies of scale would suggest that GM will try to recoup it investment in this TT V6 by offering it in more than just the CTS. Obviously, the ATS and the XTS are possible candidates for offering the engine. Some theoretical Alpha-platform Buick (Grand National?) might also be a possibility. And, then, of course, there's the Camaro. We'll see...

OldScoolCamaro 03-19-2013 09:00 PM

LF3 TT6 is the next plug and play variant of high performance, coming to just about everything in a neighborhood near you in the not too distant future.

Captain Awesome 03-20-2013 07:54 PM

GM needs to bring back the LL8 and put it in trucks and cars too.

OldScoolCamaro 03-20-2013 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Awesome (Post 6312289)
GM needs to bring back the LL8 and put it in trucks and cars too.

Fair game.....:lol:
http://www.deviantart.com/download/1...n_by_ArTxD.png


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.