Call me crazy...I like the design. Just not the 4-cylinders of the 130-R concept.

If GM does make a 4-cylinder version, it won't be for the same guys driving V8s. It also will be no slouch. The reason they didn't do it this time around is that the car wasn't "fun" to drive. With less weight, less power might be necessary to make the car fun.

I understand what your saying but this phrase by itself is the exact opposite of how I and about 99% of the people who by a muscle car feel...:drum:

Here's the real new Camaro
 

i actually found a picture of the REAL new Camaro

If GM takes that car, gets rid of the middle grille bar and the ridiculously large bow tie, makes the head lights bigger and gives it some decent performance, that might be a solid entry sports car.

Well look how the press gushes over the Toybaru twins....like its the wave of the future....

Not my future. No thanks.

Yall need to :readthethread:...

The picture is of the Code 130R concept, NOT THE CAMARO. It's not a muscle car, it's not a performance car. It is designed to be a sporty-looking, fuel-efficient, cheaper, fun car marketed to younger buyers.

I think that looks sharp.

Not everything needs to be as aerodynamic as a brick.

Back in the day we used to cram 454's in those.

I remember those days. I had a 71 hatchback, my first new car. Traded it for my first Camaro...

That "European" styling that you guys are bashing is one of the reasons Cadillac is still in business.

I won't believe anything anyone from GM says after the leak of the decade Corvette....

However, that shit heap certainly isn't the next Camaro...

I'd drive it....