CAMARO6

CAMARO6 (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/index.php)
-   2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=155)
-   -   Why would anyone want a 4 cylinder 2016 camaro (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=275580)

revychevy 02-09-2013 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Number 3 (Post 6139995)
But it WON"T JUST BE GM. It will be everyone.

Yes rich people will go buy premium German they do now. That won't change. But those premium German brands will ultimately have to meet the same CAFE standards too.

The issue for me isn't whether or not there will be a 4 cylinder. And for those questioning a 4 cylinder in a Camaro?

If you can get the performance you might just see it.

If all a Camaro is to you is a "thing" that happens to have 8 cylinders then you will likely be dissapointed in 2025.

But here is the deal. In order to AVERAGE 54.5 under the new footprint guidelines AND have a V8 there will have to be economical choices as well. Putting the 2.5L 4 cylinder in a Camaro is a great choice for some people. Some people want a more stylish car that is economical, easy to use, park drive etc. That is the base engine in the ATS and it drives just fine (not for a Cadillac though ;) )

Also consider this. Chevrolet doesn't have a coupe other than the Camaro. I won't count the Corvette as it is a different animal. So Chevrolet has to get the Camaro to compete with Accord and Altima coupes. So no one should be worried about adding a 4 cyclinder to the Camaro.

So my position is simply this. If it handles, brakes and steer and goes very fast when I put my right foot down on the right pedal...................I don't care how many cylinders are there.

FUTURE SPOILER ALERT - at some point we will be discussing how we can't drive our perforamnce cars when gas is $10 per gallon. Look at the projections for the Chinese auto market lately? 30 million units by early next decade. India? Just barely getting an automobile market. Statistics show that well over half of the buyers in China and India are first time buyers. That is telling. And they will all want oil.

2nd FUTURE SPOILER ALERT - at some point this conversation will be had about eliminating gasoline or diesel and only having electric propulsion (EVs and Fuel Cells are coming). And EVs can be pretty fun to drive as well.

If Camaros are going to be the new Honda accord I don't want one. If they are going to be Altimas-- No. EV's can be pretty fun? What site are we on? You are HOPING for a prius Camaro? You can buy a Leaf or Prius right now! Why advocate for a Camaro to be one? You guys always claim V8 owners are attacking V6rs. All I see is attacks against anyone who even states they like V8's. Maybe this forum is done for me and I just need to find one where one is not ridiculed for liking LS3 and LS7 engines.

90503 02-09-2013 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revychevy (Post 6140237)
If Camaros are going to be the new Honda accord I don't want one. If they are going to be Altimas-- No. EV's can be pretty fun? What site are we on? You are HOPING for a prius Camaro? You can buy a Leaf or Prius right now! Why advocate for a Camaro to be one? You guys always claim V8 owners are attacking V6rs. All I see is attacks against anyone who even states they like V8's. Maybe this forum is done for me and I just need to find one where one is not ridiculed for liking LS3 and LS7 engines.

Don't despair...for some reason if you don't want a 4 cylinder car to be added to the Camaro line, you're a "hater"....I see it the opposite way, no 4cyl equals Camaro "lover"...Get your beloved 4-cylinder in some other make and model of car that won't be associated with what made these Camaros something special...

tramtwo 02-09-2013 10:46 AM

damn tree huggers... wonder when they will start throwing red paint on our cars

Edit: you can have yours just give me mine

ToolFan66 02-09-2013 11:17 AM

And the fact would also be that if the Camaro didn't come with a V8 there would be one less Camaro owner out there "ME".

All you V6ers can talk all the "burn" crap you want, but with out the history of the V8 the history of the Camaro changes in a big way, and more then likely we wouldn't have the 5th gen we have today..

So put that in your pipe and smoke it, and STFU already nobody cares what you purchased and drive but you..

It's just a car and its your car so get in drive and enjoy..

V6ers saved the Camaro and V8, that is the dumbest yet funniest thing I have read on this Fourm!!

IncrediblyX 02-09-2013 11:29 AM

They should keep the V8 but incorporate technology where the engine shuts off at stoplights and where 4 cylinders deactivate when you don't need the horsepower. That way, Camaros can keep that exhaust sound that everyone is in love with and kick the future Mustang's butt. A turbo V6 would be nice too. Anything over 400 hp is a bit excessive for daily use. Also... what happened to door panels that resisted door dings that Saturn used to put on their cars? Their cars were super lightweight, quick and great on gas mileage without all that extra steel.

KMPrenger 02-09-2013 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToolFan66 (Post 6140353)
And the fact would also be that if the Camaro didn't come with a V8 there would be one less Camaro owner out there "ME".

All you V6ers can talk all the "burn" crap you want, but with out the history of the V8 the history of the Camaro changes in a big way, and more then likely we wouldn't have the 5th gen we have today..

So put that in your pipe and smoke it, and STFU already nobody cares what you purchased and drive but you..

It's just a car and its your car so get in drive and enjoy..

V6ers saved the Camaro and V8, that is the dumbest yet funniest thing I have read on this Fourm!!

lol. Gotta love this big boy talk.

But seriously, nobody believes the V6 or the V8 saved the Camaro. They go hand in hand when it comes to this car. GM saved it by making it attractive this time around. Without the good looks, the car fails, and same goes for the next gen.

Norm Peterson 02-09-2013 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ToolFan66 (Post 6140353)
V6ers saved the Camaro and V8, that is the dumbest yet funniest thing I have read on this Fourm!!

Even you should admit at least to yourself that the business case for the 5th Gen Camaro would have been considerably weaker without the V6 option.


Norm

Number 3 02-09-2013 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revychevy (Post 6140237)
If Camaros are going to be the new Honda accord I don't want one. If they are going to be Altimas-- No. EV's can be pretty fun? What site are we on? You are HOPING for a prius Camaro? You can buy a Leaf or Prius right now! Why advocate for a Camaro to be one? You guys always claim V8 owners are attacking V6rs. All I see is attacks against anyone who even states they like V8's. Maybe this forum is done for me and I just need to find one where one is not ridiculed for liking LS3 and LS7 engines.

Wow!!! Sure hope you didn't hurt yourself jumping to all of those conclusions there.

Love the LS7. If you knew my life story you might begin to understand that.

Where did you get the hoping for a Prius Camaro? We do have a $1 Million dollar Porsche Hybrid though. Is that a bad thing?

The Camaro IS a coupe. LS and LT compete against other V6 coupes in the same price range. You are missing something if you don't understand the the coupe banner is carried by the Camaro. And if all you need in a stylish coupe is a V6 for some fun and reasonable economy, then the things that this website has b**ched about for 3 years now matter. Trunk space and lift over. High belt lines and poor visibilty. Poor sightlines out the back. And as many miles as I've put on Camaro's, I have yet to try to parallel park one.

You act as if there were no Berlinettas in the Camaros past. At it's heart it is a stylish and affordable coupe. SS, IROC and Z28 versions over the years have made for some awesome cars...............based on a stylish coupe.

Would GM be better off if the Camaro was THE coupe of choice? Stealing sales from Honda and Nissan? You better believe it.

I hope you able to see the train wreck of higher and higher gas prices coming at us. And I am curious as to what that solution is from your perspective. The only way to keep a V8 powered car in the Fleet is to have far more economical choices to choose from. And if stealing sales from Honda and Nissan on the 4 and 6 cyclinder cars gets the numbers high enough then there is more room for a V8 in the Average.

Also don't you think the Camaro would have been farrrrrrrr better off at launch with an interior and ergonomics similar to the Honda and Nissan coupes? Boy I sure do.

2010-1SS-IBM 02-09-2013 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson (Post 6140443)
Even you should admit at least to yourself that the business case for the 5th Gen Camaro would have been considerably weaker without the V6 option.


Norm

When are you going to realize that you're always bringing up the V6 in this argument because even you 4 cylinder supporters can't defend a 4 cylinder on it's own merits?

2010-1SS-IBM 02-09-2013 11:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Number 3 (Post 6139995)
But it WON"T JUST BE GM. It will be everyone.

Used and refurbished. We did it in the late 70's & early 80's. History doesn't repeat, but it can rhyme.

When are you guys going to understand that buyers don't respect companies who sell "performance" cars whose main purpose is economy? And that there's always another option.

2010-1SS-IBM 02-09-2013 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Number 3 (Post 6140448)
I hope you able to see the train wreck of higher and higher gas prices coming at us. And I am curious as to what that solution is from your perspective. The only way to keep a V8 powered car in the Fleet is to have far more economical choices to choose from. And if stealing sales from Honda and Nissan on the 4 and 6 cyclinder cars gets the numbers high enough then there is more room for a V8 in the Average.

Also don't you think the Camaro would have been farrrrrrrr better off at launch with an interior and ergonomics similar to the Honda and Nissan coupes? Boy I sure do.

Wow, you're really selling this econo-Maro.

Anyway, the US is going through an energy boom right now. And once other countries start using fracking tech, energy worries are over.

The only thing keeping gas prices up right now is our sinking dollar. All commodity prices are up because of it.

Norm Peterson 02-09-2013 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2010-1SS-IBM (Post 6140455)
When are you going to realize that you're always bringing up the V6 in this argument because even you 4 cylinder supporters can't defend a 4 cylinder on it's own merits?

Because what the four is intended to cover this time around is exactly what the sixxes have been doing for the Camaro since 1967 (and the Mustang since a couple of years before that. "Entry level" to the Camaro.

Try to get past the idea that 4's are incapable of decent performance.

And for the record, I've been mentioning IL-6's as well. Not all sixxes are/were V's.


Norm

ToolFan66 02-09-2013 12:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KMPrenger (Post 6140440)
lol. Gotta love this big boy talk.

But seriously, nobody believes the V6 or the V8 saved the Camaro. They go hand in hand when it comes to this car. GM saved it by making it attractive this time around. Without the good looks, the car fails, and same goes for the next gen.

Big boy talk? :thumbdown: lol gotta love the V6er talk..

I agree with the good looks and I also agree both motors go hand in hand. I'm OK with it. But the whole V6 saved the V8/Camaro childish I can't believe I have a drivers license posts above are ridiculous...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson (Post 6140443)
Even you should admit at least to yourself that the business case for the 5th Gen Camaro would have been considerably weaker without the V6 option.


Norm

I do admit it, and as I stated I'm OK with it. I never said other wise. The only thing I said is I wouldn't be driving one if not for the V8. It's just my personal preference.

2010-1SS-IBM 02-09-2013 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson (Post 6140504)
Because what the four is intended to cover this time around is exactly what the sixxes have been doing for the Camaro since 1967 (and the Mustang since a couple of years before that. "Entry level" to the Camaro.

Try to get past the idea that 4's are incapable of decent performance.

And for the record, I've been mentioning IL-6's as well. Not all sixxes are/were V's.


Norm

The turbo 4 they're talking about is a step down from the current 6. Sorry, it's not a performer.

awfarley 02-09-2013 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by revychevy (Post 6140209)
That's silly. Your v6 wouldn't exist without a V8 either. It would have just been a Monsa.

It just goes to show that the "V6's don't belong in a Camaro" guys are stupid.

Obviously, the two wouldn't exist without each other. That's not the point. You don't hear any V6 owners saying the V8's don't belong do you?

Let's try to keep things in context here.

Watching these threads to into all out bashes is sooo fun. I'll just sit back and watch. This is getting good.
:popcorn:

90503 02-09-2013 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by awfarley (Post 6140751)
It just goes to show that the "V6's don't belong in a Camaro" guys are stupid.

Obviously, the two wouldn't exist without each other. That's not the point. You don't hear any V6 owners saying the V8's don't belong do you?

Let's try to keep things in context here.

Watching these threads to into all out bashes is sooo fun. I'll just sit back and watch. This is getting good.
:popcorn:

Don't think anyone is bashing the v6...Quite the contrary...Keep the V-6, upgrade it, whatever...The Camaro doesn't need a smaller/"entry-level" I-4....The V-6 already serves that purpose and offers more than any I-4 does...

....Sinking good money into a "smaller" engine takes away funds and technology research, whatever that could go into improving v-6s and v8s..

If the Camaro had no other option than the v-8, sure sales would suffer and the need for a less expensive option would be needed to keep the car afloat...But that is not the case...The v-6 has done just fine for several years already...

I sort of see more v-6ers cheerleading for an I-4 just so they can rub an embarrassing engine in the face of v-8 owners...sad to see performance, horsepower, "muscle", if you will, going in the wrong direction...

awfarley 02-09-2013 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 90503 (Post 6140810)
Don't think anyone is bashing the v6...Quite the contrary...Keep the V-6, upgrade it, whatever...The Camaro doesn't need a smaller/"entry-level" I-4....The V-6 already serves that purpose and offers more than any I-4 does...

....Sinking good money into a "smaller" engine takes away funds and technology research, whatever that could go into improving v-6s and v8s..

If the Camaro had no other option than the v-8, sure sales would suffer and the need for a less expensive option would be needed to keep the car afloat...But that is not the case...The v-6 has done just fine for several years already...

I sort of see more v-6ers cheerleading for an I-4 just so they can rub an embarrassing engine in the face of v-8 owners...sad to see performance, horsepower, "muscle", if you will, going in the wrong direction...

Yeah I see your point but I'm not one of your cheerleaders lmao.

I understand that the market and regulations are changing and a 4-cyl. Camaro may very well be in our future. I agree with you on the whole 'use the money on improving what you already have' deal. The CAFE standards are a crock though. Carbureted engines have been getting 40+ MPG for decades and suddenly it's a problem to get an electric car over that. Then you have the VW Rabbit Diesel which easily saw 55+.

I would much rather see future Camaros have no less than 6 cylinders but if they decide to drop a '4' in one I'll just not buy it and continue my life as normal :laugh:

OverZeaLouS 02-09-2013 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by INTIMIDAT3R (Post 6133486)
Because a 2 cylinder Camaro would just be silly. :D

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!:sm0:

otter 02-09-2013 04:18 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Chevy HAD a four cylinder Camaro in the 70's. They just called it the "Vega" I had one for about six months. It was a bad idea then. It's a bad idea now.

Captain Awesome 02-09-2013 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldScoolCamaro (Post 6138964)
....wake up and smell the GOV. The shit is gettin' real as in a not to distant past phrase suggests..., look I want 8's forever, truth is it ain't happen', the modern DI motors... 4 or 6's, with forced induction will take over, not my decision. There will be the next Gen 5 8 cyl family, but at a premium,... sorry, but even though the climate is beyond turning around, the GOV will do it's best to further complicate our issues and pass the price down to the consumer. Welcome to the 21st century.

The only thing that appears to be beyond hope of turning around is the successful science defying brainwashing that has otherwise perfectly intelligent people worshipping at the altar of "climate".

It's so bad nowadays that people freely give up their freedoms to coporatists in the GOV getting rich off this claptrap while accumulating power from stolen liberty.

All the while the clapping seal reporters^h^h^h^h^h^h repeaters churn out propaganda that blinds many people to the facts until it is too late.

Captain Awesome 02-09-2013 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OldScoolCamaro (Post 6139022)
Folks, as they say, it's baked in the cake..the new motors are going to rock, it's the change over factor that have the most vocal indualvistalic opponists concered about change....accept, not fear it..., why the worry?

Because if you let the government decide what kind of car you can drive, who knows what will happen next? One day you may wake up in a country where the government tells you what kind of milk you can drink, what kind of lightbulbs you can buy, what kind of toilet you can install, and what kind of guns you can own. OOPS! TOO LATE!

We have to draw the line before these things happen, otherwise it will snowball. How would you like to live in a world where you are told what job you will have and what state you must live in.

Captain Awesome 02-09-2013 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Number 3 (Post 6139995)
FUTURE SPOILER ALERT - at some point we will be discussing how we can't drive our perforamnce cars when gas is $10 per gallon. Look at the projections for the Chinese auto market lately? 30 million units by early next decade. India? Just barely getting an automobile market. Statistics show that well over half of the buyers in China and India are first time buyers. That is telling. And they will all want oil.

2nd FUTURE SPOILER ALERT - at some point this conversation will be had about eliminating gasoline or diesel and only having electric propulsion (EVs and Fuel Cells are coming). And EVs can be pretty fun to drive as well.

And they accuse me of being all "Doom" and "Gloom"?

If all that is true, then pretty much mothing we are being forced to do now regarding CAFE and such actually amounts to ANYTHING. All the oil is going to eventually get used up by china, and they will use it up in the most polluting possible ways.

The way I see your scanario is that we're now forcing people to pay tons of money on super efficient cars so that we can preserve the fuel supply so that our enemies can have it when they begin expanding.

So we intentionally hobble ourselves for nothing.

In that light, not only is CAFE illegal as I have been saying, but it's also incredibly useless and therefore is utter STUPIDITY.

Captain Awesome 02-09-2013 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2010-1SS-IBM (Post 6140470)
Used and refurbished. We did it in the late 70's & early 80's. History doesn't repeat, but it can rhyme.

They learned their lesson last time.

This time they took YOUR tax dollars and GAVE them to people in exchange for their perfectly good used cars so they could GRIND THEM UP, so you won't be able to find one when you are shopping for one in the future to get aroud this CAFE crap.

Cash for Knuckleheads.

90503 02-09-2013 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by otter (Post 6141252)
Chevy HAD a four cylinder Camaro in the 70's. They just called it the "Vega" I had one for about six months. It was a bad idea then. It's a bad idea now.

Holy crap!...I think you found the Gen6 body-style!...lol

revychevy 02-09-2013 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Number 3 (Post 6140448)
Wow!!! Sure hope you didn't hurt yourself jumping to all of those conclusions there.

Love the LS7. If you knew my life story you might begin to understand that.

Where did you get the hoping for a Prius Camaro? We do have a $1 Million dollar Porsche Hybrid though. Is that a bad thing?

The Camaro IS a coupe. LS and LT compete against other V6 coupes in the same price range. You are missing something if you don't understand the the coupe banner is carried by the Camaro. And if all you need in a stylish coupe is a V6 for some fun and reasonable economy, then the things that this website has b**ched about for 3 years now matter. Trunk space and lift over. High belt lines and poor visibilty. Poor sightlines out the back. And as many miles as I've put on Camaro's, I have yet to try to parallel park one.

You act as if there were no Berlinettas in the Camaros past. At it's heart it is a stylish and affordable coupe. SS, IROC and Z28 versions over the years have made for some awesome cars...............based on a stylish coupe.

Would GM be better off if the Camaro was THE coupe of choice? Stealing sales from Honda and Nissan? You better believe it.

I hope you able to see the train wreck of higher and higher gas prices coming at us. And I am curious as to what that solution is from your perspective. The only way to keep a V8 powered car in the Fleet is to have far more economical choices to choose from. And if stealing sales from Honda and Nissan on the 4 and 6 cyclinder cars gets the numbers high enough then there is more room for a V8 in the Average.

Also don't you think the Camaro would have been farrrrrrrr better off at launch with an interior and ergonomics similar to the Honda and Nissan coupes? Boy I sure do.

I was not jumping to conclusions and I don't know your background (why would I?) you said it needed to to be like a Honda or Nissan. We disagree sir. While I am NOT against V6's as a base trim, my feelings about the Essence of what a Camaro is does not include it being the same or similar to an accord or Altima or an EV which you also mentioned.

Like many on here you back up your statements by acting as if you didn't make them and the other person is crazy. I can't be the only Camaro enthusiast who doesn't want the Camaro to devolve into a Honda accord or an econo cruze.

Now explain to me how foolish I am for not wanting the Camaro to be just like every other boring middle of the road Honda, Nissan, or Toyota.

Go ahead and speak the praises of the Accord and 4 cylinder hybrid econo boxes. Tell us how the days of fire breathing muscle cars are thankfully over and
We should embrace mediocrity. The Camaro has never been mediocre, just another coupe for the masses. I believe it's special and one of Americas unique muscle cars. That why I'm on this site. They make Honda sites and Prius chat for people who really like them.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.