CAMARO6

CAMARO6 (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/index.php)
-   2016+ Camaro: 6th Gen Camaro general forum (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=155)
-   -   "SS 378" badge - good idea or tacky (https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=423569)

fastball 09-16-2015 01:34 PM

"SS 378" badge - good idea or tacky
 
1 Attachment(s)
I'm thinking of having "SS" and "376" badges made for the front fenders, between the front of the door and front wheels, ala the old muscle car days when SS Chevys had the SS badge and the cu. in. of the engine on the fenders.

You think that's tacky or cool?

Attachment 744476

Mikamaro 09-16-2015 01:36 PM

Isn't it a 376?

fastball 09-16-2015 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikamaro (Post 8641477)
Isn't it a 376?

Yes you are correct

FenwickHockey65 09-16-2015 01:39 PM

Pretty sure it's 376.

Just my opinion, but I hate seeing old badges on new cars. I'd do something similar but I'd keep the modern font for the badges.

mcsoul 09-16-2015 01:39 PM

327, 350, 383, 400, 427, 454 and a few others are the legendary cube values. 376, 378, not so much. Great engine, just no cache in the cubic inch value. If anything the 6.2l moniker has good cache.

fastball 09-16-2015 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 (Post 8641482)
Pretty sure it's 376.

Just my opinion, but I hate seeing old badges on new cars. I'd do something similar but I'd keep the modern font for the badges.


You're right

FenwickHockey65 09-16-2015 01:40 PM

GM says 376.

http://media.gm.com/media/us/en/chev...2016.tab1.html

fastball 09-16-2015 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FenwickHockey65 (Post 8641486)


Ah yes, 376 cu.in. = 6.16 liters, rounded up = 6.2

Thanks, duly noted and corrected!

Denis 09-16-2015 01:46 PM

I like the idea for hi/po models like Mopar does with the 392, however if they decide to do that everyone will get all butt hurt thinking that GM is copying Mopar. Even though its been done since they've been putting big motors in cars.

http://s1.cdn.autoevolution.com/imag...ew-2014_52.jpg

fastball 09-16-2015 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcsoul (Post 8641484)
327, 350, 383, 400, 427, 454 and a few others are the legendary cube values. 376, 378, not so much. Great engine, just no cache in the cubic inch value. If anything the 6.2l moniker has good cache.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fastball (Post 8641485)
You're right

That's not a bad idea either, SS 6.2.

I wish car companies stuck with the cubic inches though.

BahamaTodd 09-16-2015 02:13 PM

SS
LT1

LT1 definitely has cache.

shaffe 09-16-2015 02:33 PM

I don't think its tacky, but I am just not sure it would look right on a newer car

Mark114 09-16-2015 03:01 PM

Your car - your choice. I will probably remove the factory side badges from mine. I will have to see the car in person before I decide about front and rear badges.

"Badges? We don't need no stinking badges!" :smiling1:

KMPrenger 09-16-2015 03:02 PM

Do with the modern font and I'd be up for it.

Old font on the new car does not work for me...looks awkward.

I'm sure EmblemPros or someone like that will be doing this eventually.

Not sure that the tiny Camaro Tri-bar on the side does it for me.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.