More Details on the 2020 LT1
Here are some more details on the 2020 LT1:
Model designation is 1LZ. 7" Chevy Infotainment 3 system. Voice recognition only through phone. 8" Chevy Infotainment 3 system available as part of Technology Package. Has same single zone climate control as SS. Has standard Driver information Center, rather than 8" Enhanced of SS. Visor vanity mirrors are non-illuminated (SS are illuminated). 4 piston Brembo brakes in the front, and non-Brembo in the rear (SS has Brembo in the rear). No external engine oil cooler, extra capacity cooling system, engine coolant auxiliary cooler, transmission cooler or differential cooler that are included with SS. New 20" silver painted aluminum wheels (non-staggered). 245/45R20 All season run flat tires front and rear. FE3 Performance suspension standard (same as SS). Magnetic ride control not available. 6-speed Manual Transmission does not include rev matching that SS has. OnStar/SiriusXM fin antenna black instead of body color on the SS. Taillights not dark tinted (SS taillights are dark tinted). No standard rear spoiler. Lip spoiler optional. Curb weight of LT1 with 6 speed manual is 66 pounds lighter than SS. |
The lack of MRC option is the biggest disappointment, along with no rev match. I guess I thought rev match was mainly software.
|
Quote:
They didn't come up with the LT1 so that you could selectively option down a 1SS. There is no way they would let you get an LT1 and make it a 1SS by checking option codes. It has to be something less than an SS. As mentioned, can you imagine an LT1 1LE? That would simply make no sense. But we are talking about GM so who knows. |
Just the way it should be, a V8, 10 speed auto and all the junk you dont need on the car...priceless.... thank you chevy.
|
Hopefully, the LT1 will be the perfect buyer alternative to all those base Mustang GTs Ford is using to kick the Camaro’s butt in the annual sales race.
|
Well the way I see it is that Chevy is offering a lower cost alternative V8 Camaro to the SS after people have been asking for one which is good but won’t satisfy some folks! I can see by some of the replies that some want more options and will complain that they can’t get them on the LT-1. I commend the Camaro team that they offer a lower cost V8 Camaro for people that can’t afford or want a higher cost 1SS or 2SS but they won’t be able to please everyone. My opinion is if you want more options then buy a 2SS!
|
Quote:
|
All of this sounds pretty reasonable. Like others said, if too many options were offered, you may as well get a 1SS at that point.
This seems like a good option for people who want a basic V8 who can put their own mods onto it. |
I hereby proclaim the 2020 LT1 Camaro will be the fastest V8 NA Camaro ever built. Except for maybe a '69 ZL1 on slicks. :)
And also good match for the base Rustang GT. More discussion here. |
Quote:
Cool! So a standard optioned LT1 will weigh what....somewhere in the high 3,500 to low 3,600 lb range? Pretty sure the standard 1SS with manual was coming in around 3,650 to 3,675 lbs. How much of a weight advantage would that be compared to a base Mustang GT? EDIT: Got it: https://media.chevrolet.com/media/us...2019.tab1.html According to the above link , a 2020 LT1 Camaro would weigh 3,619 lbs. That would give it right around 100lbs less than the base GT. |
Great info
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your analysis of why it would be economical for GM to have two cars trims which are (or could be ordered to) have virtually identical equipment would help, too. No where else in the Camaro lineup is that currently possible. That said, IF rev match is indeed just software, I would agree with you that feature could have been left in the LT1 without adversely affecting the rationale for the LT1 which Number 3 has outlined. Unless they've found that they can save money by using the paddle-less LT-spec wheel on the manual LT1, rather than the manual SS wheel with paddles? |
Considering the LT1 has standard brakes, no cooling for the track, no MRC and no rev match, this seems to me to be quarter mile bruiser. Light/stripped car with big engine that goes straight. Now I'm wondering if we're going to see a $45,000 2021 LT4. :pop2:
|
This car should sell a bunch.
Just curious who makes the all-season run flat tires? :pop2: |
Quote:
|
The LT1 will have the same size tires front and back according to the information. This Camaro will be a gearheads dream because of the mods you can do to it.
|
Everything looked good till they said its only 66lbs lighter... no real gains there if it would've been at least 150lbs lighter it would've been a game changer. But taking everything off just shows that this car was just focused on camaro sales and not really performance.
|
For all of those people who slapped LT1 badges on their SS Camaros, the uneducated population will think you have a basic V8 Camaro. :noidea:
|
Quote:
|
I thought 66lbs over a base 1ss was pretty good. U gotta remember over a mrc npp or def a 1le car it will be closer to your 150lb
|
Quote:
66 lbs of less weight is just a bonus. |
It's not 66lbs less of useless stuff though is it? It's not like they are drilling big holes in all the useless metal in the body of the car, they're removing or changing out things that have a function.
Kinda like how they saved weight by not putting any sound deadening in the car. Yea, you saved weight, but we just have to add it back in if we dont want the whole car to vibrate anytime you press the gas pedal. |
Where are the real life pics. I some where it was on display somewhere.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The lack of engine oil, transmission, and differential coolers is puzzling.
|
Quote:
Seems like with what they dropped they could have lowered the price a smidge more. Sounds like it doesn't have LED tail lights and headlights...? A lot like the old Formula package. I like it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's a good option for someone looking for a better than average cookie cutter commuter car and/or wanting just a little more than the base Turbo 4 or the 6 cylinder without going to an SS.
It won't tempt me, I'm still loving my relatively base 2016 6 cylinder M/T as my commuter car. Decent on gas, low on insurance and runs on cheap 87 octane gas. Probably the lowest cost to own Camaro option. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
36,000 in 2010 is equal to $41,700 today |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.autotrader.com/Chevrolet/Camaro/2012 Inflation estimator result: $32,280 in 2012 → $35,304.62 in 2018 http://www.in2013dollars.com/2012-do...8?amount=32280 Faster, better, same price. Plus I think I was paying $4 a gallon for regular fuel back in 2012. |
What I'm really wondering is how 4 cyl and V6 Models will hold up after this is released.
|
1ss way better value. All the upgrades are worth way more than the price difference. the
value sweet spots 1ss is daily driver, with magnetic and active exhaust + $300 black wheel addon. AND 1le is for more track focused, but more annoying wider wheels/tires (kick rocks up that chip your paint) better value than the mustang equivalents. |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.