| Frank in MD |
03-17-2014 12:49 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlander
(Post 7498851)
I see AWD as an opportunity, not a penalty. Making a Camaro as all season capable as a WRX isn't really a bad thing, is it?
I was thinking the Challenger would be the first one in the market to offer AWD but that hasn't happened.
I got rid of an '06 Mustang GT that was useless in the snow and got one of those fugly AWD Honda Crosstours that was an absolute blast to drive year round, especially with the stability control disabled.
In any case, if they build it I'd buy it.
|
I don't disagree that there should be something in the Chevy lineup that's AWD, and there is; Equinox & Traverse. If you prefer AWD, Buick has a very nice one w/ the GS or you go w/ a WRX Sti or an EVO. IMO AWD would be a penalty on Camaro, AWD is to Camaro what feathers are to fish.
Camaro is a pony car, not a muscle car, not a sports car, not a ricer and never AWD. Camaro is an affordable, lightweight 2 door coupe, RWD platform with a long hood and a short decklid with sportiness and power. This year they strayed a bit from that recipe but got away with it only because the car is absolutely beautiful.
AWD is a bad thing for Camaro as IMO it's a sure fire way to make the car far more expensive and help kill the car off again when sales fall. I'm sure a market exists for compact AWD cars like those I mentioned but compare sales, who sells more? Camaro, EVO, WRX Sti? |
